cm0002@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor · 2 months agoMore code = more betterlemmy.zipimagemessage-square94linkfedilinkarrow-up1667arrow-down116
arrow-up1651arrow-down1imageMore code = more betterlemmy.zipcm0002@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor · 2 months agomessage-square94linkfedilink
minus-squareDumhuvudlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·2 months agoYou jest, but you aren’t wrong. At least if we are talking about C, C++ or Rust. https://godbolt.org/z/oPPfdfcf5 .NET compiler is weak when it comes to optimizing your code; I assume Go’s is as bad.
minus-squareYggstyle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoTechnically yes… But I think he was more making the excuse for the gore “from the goresmith’s perspective.” And I’m not sure if the compiler in any language would change a random check function… The others are a possibility.
You jest, but you aren’t wrong. At least if we are talking about C, C++ or Rust. https://godbolt.org/z/oPPfdfcf5
.NET compiler is weak when it comes to optimizing your code; I assume Go’s is as bad.
Technically yes… But I think he was more making the excuse for the gore “from the goresmith’s perspective.”
And I’m not sure if the compiler in any language would change a random check function… The others are a possibility.