schnurrito, schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
Instance: discuss.tchncs.de
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 276
Comments: 284
Posts and Comments by schnurrito, schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
Comments by schnurrito, schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
did we hug it to death? :( “504 Gateway Time-out / nginx”
Zeuge wovon? Es ist im Imperativ formuliert, also ist es eine Aufforderung, keine Behauptung einer Tatsache.
Alright, I agree with you that modern “social media recommendation algorithms” are a bad thing that shouldn’t have been invented, if that is what you’re getting at.
I definitely agree with all of that.
But if you “learned the shortcuts to hide” what you were doing, then you were clearly accessing things you actively wanted to see, which was my entire point.
OK, if someone actively links me to it, then yes, but there’s also no solution to that because they could just send it (or a screenshot of it) directly to me and circumvent any filters there might be.
I’ve never clicked on a “hot singles in your area” ad, so no idea what that is about.
The entire Internet is of course IMHO about exploring and pursuing novel experiences; but how quickly do you imagine children can get from websites actively recommended by parents to shocking websites? Not very, I think?
I think you’re looking for either WordPress’s ActivityPub plugin or this: https://activitypub.ghost.org/
That’s not very similar to how AI typically writes, at all.
Üble Nachrede liegt laut Strafgesetzbuch vor, wenn jemand über einen anderen „eine Tatsache behauptet oder verbreitet, welche denselben verächtlich zu machen oder in der öffentlichen Meinung herabzuwürdigen geeignet ist“. Verleumdung liegt vor, wenn jemand „wider besseres Wissen in Beziehung auf einen anderen eine unwahre Tatsache behauptet oder verbreitet“, welche ihn verächtlich machen oder in der öffentlichen Meinung herabwürdigen kann.
Inwiefern ist das, was auf dem Plakat stand, eine Tatsache, die behauptet oder verbreitet wird?
even I have been somewhat traumatized by accessing graphic content I shouldn’t have
Why did you access it if it made you feel bad? It is (and has been since I remember) very difficult to accidentally run across anything shocking on the Internet.
I realize that, academically.
I feel that what I am buying with a lottery ticket is a few days of allowing myself to imagine what my life might be like if I win.
And I invest vastly more of my money than I buy in lottery tickets.
… they are in my country, at least for people who want to attend a university.
I realize myself that the lottery is a tax on lack of statistical knowledge. I still occasionally play it because if I don’t play, then the probability of winning (and never having to work for money again) is 0, and I can easily afford to occasionally buy a lottery ticket.
because civil liberties don’t fit neatly into a left-right spectrum, despite being a lot more important than the economic policies that the left-right spectrum aims to describe, which is why I think the left-right spectrum is mostly useless
Yes, and it also says LIBE, which is the committee, not plenary, where this was recently voted on. It’s clearly not enough members for a plenary vote, this post is misinformation as titled.
It doesn’t have a paywall for me; sorry if it does for some people, I wouldn’t have linked to it if I had known this, but leaving it up because it clearly doesn’t for everyone.
at least https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22780466/why-cant-my-program-compile-under-windows-7-in-french was actually funny
Has someone already tried to solve the world’s energy problems by hooking up a generator to John Perry Barlow’s grave?
“Fediverse content” is absolutely indexed by Google, like everything else on the public web. Why would Google choose to ignore it just because it is from the fediverse?
But it usually doesn’t show up very prominently, and which instances’ copies do show up can be completely unpredictable. Probably the search built into fediverse software is more useful if you want to specifically search here.
not really, every Lemmy instance has an owner…
What federation is is that every Lemmy instance gets some of its data not just from its users, but also from other Lemmy instances. You can think of each Lemmy instance as one mini-reddit, in principle there is no difference between reddit and one single Lemmy instance. Federation means that Lemmy instances copy their data from/to each other so that you can talk to users who use other ones too.
I miss the days when making money from posting things on the Internet wasn’t really a (widespread) thing. In the earliest days of YouTube there was no partner program, everyone who uploaded anything there did so out of enthusiasm; if we still had that, maybe we’d have fewer videos overall, but no one would have a reason to post AI slop or other low-quality videos just for profit.
c/xkcd
No Stupid Questions
did we hug it to death? :( “504 Gateway Time-out / nginx”
Zeuge wovon? Es ist im Imperativ formuliert, also ist es eine Aufforderung, keine Behauptung einer Tatsache.
Alright, I agree with you that modern “social media recommendation algorithms” are a bad thing that shouldn’t have been invented, if that is what you’re getting at.
I definitely agree with all of that.
But if you “learned the shortcuts to hide” what you were doing, then you were clearly accessing things you actively wanted to see, which was my entire point.
OK, if someone actively links me to it, then yes, but there’s also no solution to that because they could just send it (or a screenshot of it) directly to me and circumvent any filters there might be.
I’ve never clicked on a “hot singles in your area” ad, so no idea what that is about.
The entire Internet is of course IMHO about exploring and pursuing novel experiences; but how quickly do you imagine children can get from websites actively recommended by parents to shocking websites? Not very, I think?
I think you’re looking for either WordPress’s ActivityPub plugin or this: https://activitypub.ghost.org/
That’s not very similar to how AI typically writes, at all.
Inwiefern ist das, was auf dem Plakat stand, eine Tatsache, die behauptet oder verbreitet wird?
Why did you access it if it made you feel bad? It is (and has been since I remember) very difficult to accidentally run across anything shocking on the Internet.
I realize that, academically.
I feel that what I am buying with a lottery ticket is a few days of allowing myself to imagine what my life might be like if I win.
And I invest vastly more of my money than I buy in lottery tickets.
System76 on Age Verification Laws (blog.system76.com)
… they are in my country, at least for people who want to attend a university.
I realize myself that the lottery is a tax on lack of statistical knowledge. I still occasionally play it because if I don’t play, then the probability of winning (and never having to work for money again) is 0, and I can easily afford to occasionally buy a lottery ticket.
because civil liberties don’t fit neatly into a left-right spectrum, despite being a lot more important than the economic policies that the left-right spectrum aims to describe, which is why I think the left-right spectrum is mostly useless
Yes, and it also says LIBE, which is the committee, not plenary, where this was recently voted on. It’s clearly not enough members for a plenary vote, this post is misinformation as titled.
It doesn’t have a paywall for me; sorry if it does for some people, I wouldn’t have linked to it if I had known this, but leaving it up because it clearly doesn’t for everyone.
Congress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online (theintercept.com)
Congress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online (theintercept.com)
Congress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online (theintercept.com)
Congress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online (theintercept.com)
Wenn Netzrecherche die Existenz vernichtet: Fataler Klick beim Verfassungsschutz (heise.de)