PieFed.cavoicesfromdeep, voicesfromdeep@programming.dev
Instance: programming.dev
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 1
Comments: 2
Posts and Comments by voicesfromdeep, voicesfromdeep@programming.dev
c/androidComments by voicesfromdeep, voicesfromdeep@programming.dev
A GrapheneOS developer (@springonion@mastodon.social) points out that it seems like that’s due to Revolut using Play Integrity API incorrectly (from what I understand). If they were to update the app and actually use the result, it might lead to Revolut not working on GrapheneOS either.
With my complaint, I’d like to get Revolut to work on all degoogled phones and not have any risk of an update suddenly killing support.
It’s not empty to the submitter (me).
Must be some reddit bug or it works that way by design.
A GrapheneOS developer (@springonion@mastodon.social) points out that it seems like that’s due to Revolut using Play Integrity API incorrectly (from what I understand). If they were to update the app and actually use the result, it might lead to Revolut not working on GrapheneOS either.
With my complaint, I’d like to get Revolut to work on all degoogled phones and not have any risk of an update suddenly killing support.
It’s not empty to the submitter (me).
Must be some reddit bug or it works that way by design.
Does Android's SafetyNet actually make it safer for apps to run?
I currently have a complaint at kifid (instititute for complaints against financial service providers in the Netherlands) against Revolut because it doesn’t work on degoogled phones. They claim it makes it more secure. Can anybody point me to a study or expert opinion on the security benefits of safetynet and how it protects android phones?