Sadomasochism as Make-Believe

Hypatia 24 (2):21 - 38 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "Rethinking Sadomasochism," Patrick Hopkins challenges the "radical" feminist claim that sadomasochism is incompatible with feminism. He does so by appeal to the notion of "simulation." I argue that Hopkins's conclusions are generally right, but they cannot be inferred from his "simulation" argument. I replace Hopkins's "simulation" with Kendall Walton's more sophisticated theory of "make-believe." I use this theory to better argue that privately conducted sadomasochism is compatible with feminism

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
1,642 (#23,150)

6 months
211 (#51,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nils-Hennes Stear
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

How Not To Watch Feminist Pornography.Richard Kimberly Heck - 2021 - Feminist Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1):Article 3.
Sport, Make-Believe, and Volatile Attitudes.Nils-Hennes Stear - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (3):275-288.
BDSM.Manon Garcia - 2022 - In Brian D. Earp, Clare Chambers & Lori Watson, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Sex and Sexuality. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (2):161-166.
Representation and make-believe.Alan H. Goldman - 1990 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 36 (3):335 – 350.
How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina.Colin Radford & Michael Weston - 1975 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 49 (1):67 - 93.
Metaphor and Prop Oriented Make‐Believe.Kendall L. Walton - 1993 - European Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):39-57.

View all 10 references / Add more references