Individual liberty in public health – no trumping value

In Sirpa Soini, Public Health – ethical issues (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Public health policy often limits people’s liberty for their own good. The very point of many types of public health measures is to restrict people’s options in order to stop them from doing unhealthy things, for example use harmful recreational drugs or drive without a seatbelt. While such restrictive public health policies enjoy widespread support, so does the traditional liberal idea that liberty (or autonomy) is a higher value, to be given priority in most, if not all, circumstances. In this text, I will defend the thesis that liberty is an important value, but with no claim to priority.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-14

Downloads
1,574 (#25,227)

6 months
230 (#41,745)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kalle Grill
Umeå University

References found in this work

Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press USA.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist.
Public Health Ethics.Stephen Holland - 2007 - Hoboken, NJ: Polity.

View all 10 references / Add more references