Quantifiers and Characterization

In Attitude Problems: An Essay On Linguistic Intensionality. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press. pp. 69-90 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is possible that propositionalism is the worst semantics for intensional transitives, except for all the others. At the start of Chapter 4, it was noted that there is a higher-order alternative to propositionalism. It is championed most prominently in (Montague 1974) and this chapter begins with an outline of Montague's approach. It then argues for a variant of it that employs ideas taken from (Davidson 1967) and (Goodman 1949, 1976).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intensional verbs and quantifiers.Friederike Moltmann - 1997 - Natural Language Semantics 5 (1):1-52.
Intensional Perceptual Ascriptions.David Bourget - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (3):513-530.
Intensionality: What are intensional transitives?Jennifer M. Saul - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.
Intensionality.Graeme Forbes & Jennifer Saul - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76:75-119.
Intensionality and propositionalism.Kristina Liefke - forthcoming - Annual Review of Linguistics:4.1-4.21.
Intensional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation.Marcel den Dikken, Richard Larson & Peter Ludlow - 2018 - In Alex Grzankowski & Michelle Montague, Non-Propositional Intentionality. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 46-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
11 (#2,043,623)

6 months
11 (#1,080,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references