Order:
  1. On Being Ignorant.Anne Meylan & Kevin Reuter - 2025 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1):1-18.
    A traditional view holds that ignorance is simply the absence of knowledge. This view has recently been challenged by the Normative Account, which sees ignorance as involving a normative failure. In this paper, we argue that both perspectives capture important insights. Drawing on three empirical studies, we propose a two-senses account of ignorance, according to which there exist two notions of ignorance: one normative, the other non-normative. We also offer a new explanation of the normative aspect. Our findings suggest that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2. The Ethics of Belief in Conspiracy Theory.Sebastian Schmidt, Veli Mitova & Anne Meylan - forthcoming - In Melina Tsapos & David Coady, Conspiracy Theory and Society Research Handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    The ethics of belief is concerned with what we should believe. This paper is on the ethics of conspiracy belief: should we sometimes believe in conspiracy theories? In the first part, we discuss whether conspiracy theorists are responsible for their beliefs. We argue that they are. Conspiracy beliefs are subject to robust epistemic evaluations since they can be sufficiently responsive to epistemic reasons, thus differing from paradigmatic delusions. In the second part, we consider the epistemic rationality of conspiracy belief. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation