Re: [RFC] Make the GMP class final

From: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:11:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make the GMP class final
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 03:05, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > On Jun 28, 2024, at 18:53, Gina P. Banyard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello internals,
> > 
> > I would like to present an RFC to make the GMP class final:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/gmp-final
> > 
> > This is short and to the point, and I intend to open voting for this after the mandatory
> > discussion period of 2 weeks has happened, i.e. on the 13th of July 2024.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Gina P. Banyard
> 
> 
> Is this RFC intended to compete with the “Operator Overrides -- Lite Edition” RFC, which
> explicitly allows extending \GMP?
> 
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/operator_overrides_lite
> 
> (It also has a secondary vote to “disallow extending the \GMP class if this RFC fails.”
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 

Yes, this is interesting. In any case, I feel like it should be final as it is currently and
doesn't affect my RFC. If this RFC passes, it only changes a bit of the language in my RFC and
removes a secondary vote.

In any case, I haven't seen any emails of people flipping tables (like some proposals out
there) to my RFC announcement, so I suspect it isn't a terrible idea and might actually have
some merit; but I'm not going to get my hopes up. I rather suspect people are just ignoring it
and will vote "decline" out-of-hand without thinking about it.

— Rob


Thread (12 messages)

« previous php.internals (#124012) next »