@Jerry@feddit.online cover
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

Jerry

@Jerry@feddit.online

Just a techie guy running feddit.online to allow people to communicate, make friends and acquaintances. Odd coming from a happy introvert, right? (https://jerry.hear-me.blog/about)

I also own these publicly available applications:
Mastodon: https://hear-me.social
Alternative Mastodon UI: https://phanpy.hear-me.social
Peertube: https://my-sunshine.video
Friendica: https://my-place.social
Matrix: https://element.secure-channel.net
XMPP/Jabber: https://between-us.online
Bluesky PDS: https://blue-ocean.social (jerry.blue-ocean.social)
Mobilizon (Facebook Events Alt): https://my-group.events
and more...

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Warning to new tutamail users, your account could be temporary

I made my first and only account with tutamail and within 48 hours it was disabled due to abuse. It really bothered me because I had forwarded now deleted emails for storage, updated many accounts including my doctors with the new tuta email. The next time I try to login it tells me that my password is wrong or can't login. I...

Jerry ,
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

This is definitely the best protection. If the provider drops you, you move your domain to another provider. But, as far as I know, while almost all email providers will host your personal domain, none that I know of will do it on the free plans. But your email is your identity. You should be willing to pay for it, especially if you host it on a provider that otherwise won't make any money on you.

There are a couple of downsides. If you forget, or are unable, to renew your domain, you lose it and your emails. Make sure another family member or friend can pay the renewal for you if, for some reason, you cannot.

While your own domain makes it far less likely that your email will be canceled (because you can move it), abuse of your domain can result in your losing your domain name and your email, especially before it has earned a reputation.

Which brings up another IMPORTANT point. If you use your own domain name, then you must set up your DNS records to protect your domain from spoofers and spammers so it doesn't get blacklisted or, worse, doesn't cause cancellation of your domain name. Scammers and spammers WILL try to send email using your domain name. You need to tell email clients to toss these rogue emails and give them the means to determine spoofing and unauthorized use. Read this: https://www.valimail.com/blog/dmarc-dkim-spf-explained/

Also, be aware that SpamAssassin considers .com, .net, and .org TLDs to be far safer than .world, .online, .blog, and most others. Using one of these newer TLDs results in a higher spam score, and your email is more likely to end up in the spam folder if it reaches the magic score of 5. A new age TLD can add as much as 1 point to the spam calculation depending on the email provider receiving your email.

So your own domain name is safer but costs money and requires more work.

Jerry ,
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

https://hear-me.social is one possibility. It has the added benefit of a 12,000-character posting size as well, especially nice if the 500-character limit at .social was frustrating.

Jerry OP ,
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

startpage.com blocking VPN?

edit: I changed my location and that seems to have worked for now. still a strange thing that it was localhost and not "site blocked" or something if my location was the issue. my VPN (ExpressVPN) was set to NJ. I switched to Toronto. ___ 🤷...

This site can’t be reached localhost refused to connect. Try:  Checking the connection Checking the proxy and the firewall ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED Check your Internet connection Check any cables and reboot any routers, modems, or other network devices you may be using. Allow Vivaldi to access the network in your firewall or antivirus settings. If it is already listed as a program allowed to access the network, try removing it from the list and adding it again. If you use a proxy server… Go to the Vivaldi menu > Settings > System > Open your computer's proxy settings > Network & internet > Proxy and deselect "Automatically detect settings".
ALT
Jerry ,
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

Deleted by author

Jerry ,
@Jerry@feddit.online avatar

I deleted what I wrote before. If it federated, ignore it.

Your browser is trying to find startpage.com on your local machine instead of the Internet.

While on the VPN, open a command window and ping startpage.com. Does it return localhost or the real IP address? If it returns the real IP address, then the problem is related to the browser. Try another browser to see if it's Vivaldi-related.

If it returns localhost then maybe it's a setting in protonVPN?

This is strange. Just try to find clues.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I'd ask for a refund.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I read the post and understood the problem. Then I read Dan's reply. And he's fixing it. In fact, he's fixing it in the exact way the blog post says it should be fixed, "... but those filters should be manually triggered and always removable."

    Here's Dan's reply:

    "... I hear the community: you want text-only posts. We are going to build this as an opt-in feature. If you want microblogging, turn it on. If you prefer the classic media-only experience, nothing changes."

    Why was this blog post even written then? Now it's seeming to be personal.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    my-sunshine.video is one with no restrictions and has open registration. Don't know about others.

    My Mastodon instance refuses to federate with a specific instance, and nobody seems to know why.

    I originally signed up to mastodonapp.uk. Now that I'm attempting to get m.dollha.us running, I'm looking to pull my account from the former and move it to the latter. Easier said than done, though, because I cannot, for the life of me, seem to get my instance to federate with that instance. I have tried leaving it for a week or...

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    A relay, as in the Mastodon relay feature? As in Administration->Relays? If so, does mastodonapp.uk have an active relay? It can't be used to connect to just any Mastodon server. It has to connect to a special relay server.

    Not sure whether this is helpful.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Yes, it claims to proxy the traffic, but then you have to connect to the fedibuzz relay server.

    It sounded from the post that there was an attempt to directly connect to a Mastodon server through the relay connection, which won't work.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I just searched for @ ItsGloria @ vivaldi.net on my Mastodon instance and everything appears good. It tells me that you switched your account to Glor.

    Have you since resolved the issue then?

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Dumb question. Are you sure the "I" after the @ in ItsGloria is an upper case I (eye) and not a lower case l (L)?

    I'd really like to kick the idiot who created a font where both are identical.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Seems like a defect to me. Maybe if you write to @Gargron or @ClearlyClaire, they might help if they see your message.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Proton Mail, Tuta mail, runbox.com, to name three.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Thanks! I've tried editing it.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I see so much wrong in these claims.

    1. Anyone analyzing your traffic is not just doing so based on DNS queries. They use Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) and they track packets across the Internet to find out what you're doing. A fake request won't fool them.
    2. Similarly, they use machine learning and behavioral analysis, which won't be fooled either by a bunch of DNS queries.
    3. The increased noise could be detected as malicious activity, like a DDOS attack. You can find yourself rate limited, and your network performance can drop substantially.
    4. If the fake requests are real websites, your IP address can become associated with a wider range of interests, leading to more targeted advertising.
    5. Instead of using a simpleton's approach that won't work, use real protection. Use a paid-for VPN, or at least a reputable free one (not many) with built-in ad and tracker blocking to bypass your ISP.

    **The App sounds fishy, actually. ** Many apps come out claiming to provide some unique security, and they eventually turn rogue and start stealing information. This one sounds ripe to go rogue, especially since it can't make it into the standard store. I expect to read about MockTraffic someday being caught stealing information.

    I wouldn't go near it.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    You have to trust someone. There's no way around this. But trusting some app written by some unknown person that has nobody overseeing it is probably the worst place to put your trust.

    So, decide. You either trust some unknown app developer, your ISP, or a VPN provider. You must choose one. Which one do you choose? Choosing none means you are off the Internet.

    I have more trust in Proton VPN, Mullvad VPN, Mozilla VPN, and some other reputable VPN providers than I do in my ISP, some cheap VPN run by unknown people, or some app making crazy claims. I strongly doubt that a reputable VPN provider is doing any tracking of user traffic. But I bet MockTraffic is telling someone all the websites you're visiting.

    I think if you are worried about your traffic being tracked, you are safest with a reputable VPN provider.

    Those who are hosting on bare metal: What is stopping you from using Containers or VM's? What are you self hosting?

    Curious to know what the experiences are for those who are sticking to bare metal. Would like to better understand what keeps such admins from migrating to containers, Docker, Podman, Virtual Machines, etc. What keeps you on bare metal in 2025?

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Depends on the application for me. For Mastodon, I want to allow 12K character posts, more than 4 poll question choices, and custom themes. Can't do it with Docker containers. For Peertube, Mobilizon, and Peertube, I use Docker containers.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I see good points in this comment, even if the analogy of their being like hashtags might be a little off.

    gup.pe groups have a 1-word description. Most of them I've been unable to assign a topic to because I didn't know what the word means or it has ambiguous meanings. Most have no posts. So they land in the "unknown" topic.

    I always wondered what I would do if someone started posting porn or hate to them. It would be a nightmare. I'd just have to block the group, I suppose.

    Frankly, instead of someone creating a gup.pe-like group, I think they ought to create a community in PieFed, MBIN, or Lemmy. gup.pe was an early experiment when there wasn't a threadiverse.

    I'm fine without gup.pe or gup.pe replacements.

    My Pixel 10 warned me 8 times in 30-minutes that there was a rogue connection made. Deeply concerning

    I have a #Pixel 10 Pro XL phone, which may be the first phone to give warnings when the phone connects to a rogue cellphone tower or IMSI catcher. The OS cannot block it; it can only tell you that someone read information, and it presents an alert. It says,...

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    It's a new feature in Android 16, but older phones don't have the hardware to support it.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    According to the documentation, turning off 2G will not block emergency calls. But, yeah, having said this, definitely, it's best to remember how to switch it back on, just in case.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    My understanding is that the phone requires a modem that supports version 3.0 of Android's IRadio hardware abstraction layer (HAL). Older phone's modems do not support version 3.0.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    A cell phone repeater is a passive device. It just extends the range of an existing signal. They don't act as cell towers. They don't read information from the phone.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    In the U.S. it's illegal to do anything that would interfere with these devices because it also cuts off emergency services. Sort of like using a hospital to store weapons during a war?

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I think T-Mobile still has 2G service in some parts of the U.S. https://www.androidpolice.com/t-mobile-2g-network-is-still-active/

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    They can triangulate from the 8 readings that they did and know my location. They also know it's T-Mobile and they can subpoena T-Mobile and Google to get the information (the IMSI code will identify the dealer) to identify who bought the phone and what phone account pays for the service.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Seems to depend on what you read: https://godarkbags.com/blogs/news/imsi-catchers-the-hidden-threat-to-your-mobile-privacy-and-how-to-stop-them

    Quote:

    Can I Be Tracked With My Phone Off?

    Yes, even when your phone is turned off, it’s not entirely inactive. The radio system, controlled by a separate subsystem called Baseband, can still transmit signals. This design allows for features like remote device tracking but also means that simply turning off your phone doesn't protect you from IMSI catchers. Using a Faraday bag completely isolates your device from any external signals, providing robust protection.

    The most effective defense against these threats is to block the signals that IMSI catchers rely on. This is where Faraday bags come into play. These specially designed bags create a barrier that prevents radio waves from reaching your device, effectively neutralizing IMSI catchers and other surveillance tools.

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    It doesn't mean they are wrong. Anyway, here:

    "Based on documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency (NSA)
    had already developed a technique in 2004 to locate cell phones even when they were turned off,
    called “The Find”, mostly used to locate terrorist suspects [36]. This was accomplished through
    the use of IMSI catchers, which could wirelessly send a command to the phone’s baseband chip to
    fake any shutdown and stay on [37]. The phone could then be instructed to keep just the
    microphone on, in order to eavesdrop on conversations, or periodically send location pings. The
    only hint that the phone was still on was if it continued to feel warm even though it had been shut
    off, suggesting that the baseband processor was still running. IMSI catchers used by London’s
    Metropolitan Police are also reportedly able to shut down targeted phones remotely [38]."

    https://www.cis.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EAS499Honors-IMSICatchersandMobileSecurity-V18F.pdf

    Jerry OP ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar
    18+ thenexusofprivacy , to Fediverse
    @thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange avatar

    There's a lot of discussion of Mississippi's age verification law for social media today, after Bluesky announced they're blocking the state.

    Note that Mississippi's requirements go far beyond the Online Safety Act, MIssissippi's law, HB 1126, requires age verification for all users, and parental consent for users under 18., no matter what the content of the site is. Last week the US Supreme Court declined to block the law while it's being challenged in the courts, even though Kavanaugh described it as "likely unconstitutional".

    The law clearly should be found unconstitutional - the amicus brief from @CenDemTech, @eff et al discusses why. Still, with the current Supreme Court, who knows; they just the (somewhat narrower) Texas age verification law also should have been found unconstitutional, but SCOTUS said it was okay. So who knows. And of course this is exactly the kind of chilling effect they're aiming for, which is why it's so disappointing that SCOTUS didn't block its enforcement until the case is heard.

    As far as I know there isn't any guidance yet for people running fedi instances (or message boards, which are also covered). If you're running a US-based fedi instance, it's might well be worth talking to your lawyer about this. Here's the legislation, and here's the langauge from Section 4 (1)

    "A digital service provider may not enter into an agreement with a person to create an account with a digital service unless the person has registered the person's age with the digital service provider. A digital service provider shall make commercially reasonable efforts to verify the age of the person creating an account with a level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise from the information management practices of the digital service provider."

    fediverse@lemmy.world icon Fediverse @fediversenews

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I'm exhausted with all this. And it's not my fight. The fight belongs to the people of Mississippi. They elected their "leaders."

    Until I know for sure that I am not on the hook to pay a $10K penalty for each person on my servers, I've blocked all Mississippi IP addresses from logging in and registering on my Mastodon, Piefed, and Friendica servers.

    Wyoming will probably be next.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Why is this post NSFW???

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    On feddit.online I block both the UK and France in addition to Mississippi. However, I believe in a future upgrade, PieFed can be configured to block people from specific countries from accessing NSFW and NSFL communities (feddit.online doesn't allow NSFL communities). When that upgrade happens, I will open it again to the UK and France but keep it closed for Mississippi.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Doesn't work that way. States agree to enforce each other's civil orders

    LEAKED: A New List Reveals Top Websites Meta Is Scraping of Copyrighted Content to Train Its AI ( www.dropsitenews.com )

    Meta has scraped data from the most-trafficked domains on the internet —including news organizations, education platforms, niche forums, personal blogs, and even revenge porn sites—to train its artificial intelligence models, according to a leaked list obtained by Drop Site News....

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    My Mastodon instance is on the list. I try hard to block them.

    The problem with the list is that it's a target list, but not a list showing how much content, if any, they manage to process from any of the sites.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Just mentioning that Mozilla VPN uses Mullvad, and with their Firefox extension you can exclude individual websites from VPN protection or set preferred server locations for specific sites. So you can stay on a UK server for UK banking sites but switch to a different country server for a social site.

    Only works on Windows for now. But maybe useful given this situation.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    They can notify the hosting company that the server is violating UK law, the registrars, and payment services. This is the fear for sites not hosted in the UK. There are inter-country agreements to support civil actions.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    The Mozilla VPN with their Firefox extension (not yet on Linux), for example, lets you change the VPN server's country based on the domain you connect to and even bypass the VPN for certain domains. So, I believe it can be configured to select a U.S. VPN server, for example, when visiting a U.S. social site, but stay on the native connection when accessing BBC services. It uses Mullvad as the provider, actually, which is high quality. They can't be the only one.

    The Internet always seems to find ways to bypass blocks.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Piefed.social isn't as affected because they restrict the NSFW communities. Feddit.online doesn't have the restriction, so it's more exposed.

    The fear is a complaint being made to Digital Ocean that a server they host is violating UK law. It would be much easier for DO to remove the server than to take any other action.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    A public enforcement action by Ofcom could make it difficult because payment processors can refuse to work with the site owner, domain registrars could be pressured to suspend the domain, and hosting providers might refuse to provide services.

    Who needs this drama?

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Yes, the U.S. and the U.K. have cooperation agreements for Civil actions.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    No, totally not spam. I think the DMs would/will be greatly appreciated. I look forward to the notifications.

    Thank you for continuing the service!

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    I think it depends on the Piefed instance; it's up to the Admin.

    It should work on, for example, feddit.online. If not, something is broken.

    Jerry ,
    @Jerry@feddit.online avatar

    Likely, then, that lemmy.world has the same restriction.