Why does nothing link to the content/MS page in question? Not this article, nor the Bluesky post or replies.
I would have liked to see and verify the context, and explore the git history which should lead to some context that may give some context to what the author asks at the end: How did it come to be, with what ideas or goals, or justification, etc.
The Bluesky replies mention(/claim) that the image has been replaced, now seemingly copying a graph from Atlassian docs.
The Microsoft page is somewhere in that bluesky thread, but the image has been removed already. Here’s an article that has a copy of the image: PC Gamer
I’d say that it isn’t the original ran through the machine, but an “original” work that just so happens to take 90% from this one source image. Probably because graphs aren’t like dogs where they’re all subtly different and you can take properties from ten dogs and recombine them into a new valid dog. Once the neural net commits to a certain graph it will finish that exact graph.
be like Tim
