Every Ingrid Bergman close-up is planetary, so cuts establish a cosmic distance between them and the next shot.
Every Ingrid Bergman close-up is planetary, so cuts establish a cosmic distance between them and the next shot.
Fun film to watch in the company of your friends you play ping pong with, but really has me thinking that Hollywood movies are rarely beautiful these days. Any Cassavetes/Safdies comparison remains nonsensical, for JC the handheld camera and the editing fragment real space and real people, in Marty every shot and cut just serves to rapidly move from one thing (a symbol, a characterizing vignette, whatever) to the next — an assembly line of functional images.
An exponential articulation on Hawksian mise en scène: "Daddy, why do things have contours?" But as boa_noite argues, to say Godard filmed men and women the same would be a deep misunderstanding.
It feels as if Godard's Passion has put the pieces together for what I'm looking for in cinema, or maybe to rephrase, on trying to figure out what cinema is. When JLG recreates a painting, it doesn't become reduced to a 'painterly image'; (Greenaway, von Trier, Wes Anderson)…