Every day the ring is passed to the next person in the rotation, out in the open and acknowledged by all. The new bearer has to pledge, "I definitely will not be a punk-ass bitch and try to keep the ring, and I promise to suck everyone’s cock if I do. "
- 0 Posts
- 77 Comments
propaganjato
Technology•Palantir CEO Says a Surveillance State Is Preferable to China Winning the AI RaceEnglish
1·4 months agoInstead of “China is not trying to oppress its citizens” it’d be more accurate to say that China is not in the state of advanced decline that requires [as much] oppression of its citizens to maintain power and control. Everything else, unfortunately, is spot on.
Even left as-is, it’s a far cry from “intentional propaganda”. What motive would there even be to spread such? Do you imagine hordes of self-hating Americans, Chinese bots and shills, and China stans are behind every post that criticizes the U.S. and praises China? Or that someone somehow managed to “brainwash” a significant portion of the population into believing complete fabrications and/or turning their allegiance to China?
The reality is that most people have a far easier time believing pleasant fictions and ignoring inconvenient facts than they do swallowing their pride and conceding to an enemy. On the Internet it’s pretty much everyone, and the rare exceptions must be eradicated. Case in point.
“Probably”? Can someone point me in the direction of something slightly more conclusive? Cuz it could be that… but I could totally also believe that it’s chemicals and shit in our food and environment.
propaganjato
Technology•The IRS Tax Filing Software TurboTax Is Trying to Kill Just Got Open SourcedEnglish
1·9 months agoSo you’re saying he’s really really ugly
propaganjato
politics •AOC Seen as ‘Face’ of Democratic Party — and It’s Not Even Close: New Poll
16·9 months agoIf Chuck Schumer placed I would know that the end is nigh.
Chill dude. I’m saying that there are jobs that employ people who often have a criminal history, and gaps in their employment record really often are because tey went to jail.
So, even though you may not interview very many former criminals in your line of work, surely you shouldn’t be at a loss to understand why anyone would ever think that.
Man, you must live a privileged life if it didn’t even cross your mind that jobs might exist where that is a legitimate concern.
I believe this is the best answer.
Nah. Trying doing an iota of work to address by arguments instead of trying to convince me I owe you pages of answers for nothing but more fish bait.
Shit dude, there are so many. In my opinion the most egregious example, but also the most politically charged, is the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Even if you don’t think the actual substance of the claims is true, the government’s attempts to censor it are definitely real. But I’m not here to debate the merits of any specific instance of censorship ad nauseam.
At the heart of the matter in general is the question of whether the government should be allowed not to “make” a company censor something, but to “ask” them to “voluntarily remove” it. Technically, that’s all they’ve been doing—and even if they were doing so strictly only in good faith, it would still be contentious to argue that it’s ok for government to “strongly suggest”, i.e. exert influence over, what companies should and should not allow people to say—but that’s not all they’ve been doing.
What they’re doing is exactly what you would expect them to do if they wanted to subvert the system to stay within the technical limits of legality, while getting away with de facto full-blown censorship: bully the companies with lies and threats of reprisal until they complied—they technically don’t have to, but it’s in their best interest to do so—or, barring their ability to do that, colluding closely with private “watchdog” companies that are the next-best thing to being government entities (they receive and, importantly, depend on significant federal money, hold regular weekly meetings with relevant agencies to discuss agendas, etc) to accomplish the same thing with much the same tactics. The latter is what happened to Twitter immediately after a court barred the current administration from doing the former, and is still happening to them right now, as well as to Rumble, notable for being the biggest YouTube alternative.
I wasn’t trying to be serious, if that wasn’t clear.
Everyone else is wrong. Caution is advised: I’m being serious and it’s a serious problem. He’s talking about government censorship of media, specifically Twitter, but the problem is widespread and getting worse.
I’m disappointed that liberals who have been smart for so long can so easily become dumb as bricks because they lack the emotional maturity to criticize their own side/admit that the other side is right on this issue, if only incidentally. At the least one should be able to acknowledge that it’s been expedient for the Right to champion free speech because doing so directly protects their interests—and I don’t give them any more credit than that—but at least they’re unintentionally doing the right thing. The Left unfortunately deserves criticism, not credit, because for reasons it’s been expedient for them to censor speech because it directly forwards their interests.
In the end it’s folly to think that any side is necessarily better or more just than the other, or to think sides have any important meaning at all beyond logistical maneuvering. It baffles me that the vast majority of adults in America can watch their enemy do a thing and vehemently denounce it, then turn around and watch their ally do something perfectly analogous, if not exactly the same, and stubbornly defend it without giving an inch; without a modicum of empathy, remorse, or self-reflection. Worse is that none of it even fucking matters. People are ready to have a political orgasm when the other side gets caught mishandling secret files, but get bored hearing about how the economy is burning to the ground. Neither side gives a fuck about anything that matters because unless it can be used as political ammo, neither side will bring it up unless they have to.
A little bit of my soul died the day I realized the party I championed wasn’t so much better as it was not currently in power (or in danger of losing power), and was simply temporarily more interested in saying and occasionally even doing the right things—the absolute least amount possible—to return to power (or remain in power). Those that think I’m being the least bit cynical should know that they are not qualified to have any kind of meaningful or productive discussion on these topics—they’re wasting their breath at best, unwitting tools of propaganda at worst—and their partisan bickering collectively is literally the biggest reason we will never get out of this mess. A lot of you are young and I don’t hold it against you, but don’t take too long to get your shit straight. The world really is depending on you to direct your energy at the right causes, and Elon Musk isn’t one of them.
With literally no communication, that student has bigger things to worry about than grades, like why are Mommy and Daddy shutting me out?
If teachers refers to our current style of teaching in public education, then maybe.
Japan is such an anomaly. They are certain ways that don’t exist anywhere else, that would be impossible anywhere else. If Japan didn’t exist, I wouldn’t have believed it could.
Also they’ve been paying for stuff with their phones for years and years—on exactly what basis are they a cash society (though there’s nothing wrong with that)?






I know it’s an increasingly unpopular take and