aaaa

Rothe seem pretty close to goats

You skipped at least two steps in the situation

I just finished an episode of Doom Patrol, and I’m not sure where to begin with this question

Who do you suppose submitted the chat logs to bash.org?

I don’t entirely believe you

Funny… in my experience, the people who ask are the people who don’t have to. They are always welcome because they understand.

It has to spin. It’s round. Spinning is so much cooler than not spinning.

And this really requires a law to be broken; it’s a not a recall vote or a “you’re doing a bad job” remedy something like that, but to deal with lawbreaking.

This is not technically true. Impeachment is a 100% political process, and doesn’t require a law to be broken, only for enough of Congress to agree that the President needs to be removed.

Incidentally, this was the defense for Trump’s first two impeachments, with his lawyers arguing that since impeachment is a political process, the legal accusations should be brought to court. And at the same time his lawyers were arguing in court that if the President does it, it’s not illegal, and it can only be handled by impeachment.

Oh wow, that’s Dr. Loveless from Wild Wild West

They did get some of the Equinox crew at one point, I’m sure that helped

I still hate using a chat system as a download system. It’s just not what it’s for, we have torrents for that

Feels similar to the people using discord to distribute stuff

Well at least that qualifies you for a CEO job

Only one 7-inch television? Who gets to watch it?

you know how hard shell tacos are good, but taco bell wraps it in a tortilla sometimes for a bit of decadence?

I just want you to know how much I enjoyed this comparison

The 70s had a lot of strange things in it that people try to forget

The term “AI” has been used for decades to refer to a broad spectrum of things, often times including algorithms that had nothing to do with machine learning or inference.

Technically, what most of us have a problem with isn’t “AI” as a whole, but just LLMs and how companies are trying to replace people with them. I agree that people should be specific, as there’s a lot of practical application for machine learning and AI that has nothing to do with LLMs.

But you’re not going to get anywhere by trying to change the words people use for these things. We saw a similar thing happen with “smart” home automation devices, and before that it was people complaining about “smartphones” not being actually “smart”. But both of those terms are still in common use.

I don’t think you’ll convince anyone by trying to police the terminology for technical accuracy. The focus should be on the specific problems and harmful effects of how the technology is being used

The Internet has a tendency to amplify these bad behaviors.

It’s been said that the fastest way to get an answer to your programming question is to get someone to give you the wrong answer. Everyone jumps to correct that person much faster than they want to just answer a question.

To some degree, you have to expect people to be assholes, and you have to navigate around that. It does really suck though.

It’s more simple than you think. The only connection is that he is justifying invading neighboring lands by saying it’s the Nobel prize board’s fault for not giving him the prize.

It’s not that Greenland has to do with Norway or the Nobel prize, it’s just a “Now look what you made me do” moment on the global stage.

I don’t think it’s inappropriate to discuss how effective a protest will be. If anything, it should inspire more ideas and action.

I already said I support doing something at all, but if you’re saying we shouldn’t try to make protests more effective, then you have lost me

Compared to “Fuck you, I’m not buying my groceries until tomorrow”?

Yeah, the words have more impact than that