Cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/9202260

Vladimir Putin will spark a third world war if the Russian president is allowed to declare victory in Ukraine, according to the boss of the country’s biggest private employer.

Yuriy Ryzhenkov, chief executive of Metinvest, which ran the sprawling Azovstal steelworks that became the site of a relentless Russian assault at the start of the 2022 invasion, warned of the consequences of a Kremlin victory.

“I don’t believe that if Ukraine fails, Putin will stop,” he said in an interview ahead of the two year anniversary of the war in Ukraine. “The Baltic states, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia are the next targets.”

  • Nuddingdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    America bombing the middle east isn’t gonna start ww3?

      • force
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’ll have to convince at minimum ~300 million people of that… probably more like a billion

      • blazeknave
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I love you. Can you please monitor the entire Internet for us? (not /s)

      • Nuddingdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fair enough. I just think that the country with military bases in almost every country, that’s been at war for all but ~20 years of its entire history, is actively aiding in a genocide, while also attacking targets in the middle east, is gonna be the country to start ww3. Call me crazy I guess.

        • WhiteHawk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Who would they be fighting in that hypothetical war? Iran? It’s not really a world war if no great power is involved.

          • Nuddingdeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 years ago

            I dunno, I’ve heard people argue that we’re already in WW3, and that Putin started it years ago. I guess it all depends on what the history books of the future consider the smallest dominoes. Time will tell.

            • WhiteHawk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 years ago

              It’s still a proxy war for now (even if only one side is using a proxy), I wouldn’t call that a world war

              • RubberDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                So where Vietnam and Afghanistan. Both great powers got their teeth kicked in and withdrew because the wars where no longer politically expedient.

                I imagine this is a bit more existential for Putin, but it is also more costly by an order of magnitude.

                • WhiteHawk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yes, but neither were a world war, which was my point

                  • RubberDuck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I read it as you where implying it could escalate to worldwar and I tried to add 2 examples where this did not happen in previous occasions. Was not trying to start a fight :)

              • Nuddingdeleted by creator
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                Could lead to escalations, which would in hindsight be a clear path to world war. Interesting discussion to be had for sure.

                • WhiteHawk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Certainly possible, but in that case the US’s activities in the middle east couldn’t really be blamed

                  • Nuddingdeleted by creator
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    How so?

    • Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      America and it’s proxies bombing and committing genocide doesn’t count.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whatabout, Whatabout, Whatabout. Two wrongs don’t make a right, genocide and bombing civilians is bad no matter who does it.