UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 天前Not that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1554arrow-down126
arrow-up1528arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 天前message-square41linkfedilink
minus-squarechickenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·18 天前There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadlerlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·edit-218 天前ChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 天前ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·17 天前claude is gaud
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
claude is gaud