• 8 Posts
  • 305 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 1st, 2024

help-circle






  • I live and breathe this stuff

    SQLAlchemy AsyncSession calls greenlet_spawn which wraps a Session sync method. For async dialect+driver, the sqlalchemy dbapi driver will make async connections.

    Hey lets make an async call. You mean rewrite the exact code except with dispersed await sprinkled about? Fuck that! Once is enough. Instead wrap the sync call in a greenlet_spawn. And then return to the gulag of static type checking hell forever.

    So is it async all the way thru? No. It’s async enough™




  • Boss picks up on office chatter and gets to thinking, we’ve dug to the bottom of the barrel and then some, attracting a host of degenerates scum from across the planet. Having reached bottom, still digging, are coming on the truly below barrel dredge, which rank despicable bastards, will fit right in with the latest waves of jihadi hordes and related scum, yeah we are talk’n about Python coders toss tosers been coming ashore to spread chaos and strict type checking misery. They can’t stop making more static type checkers. The wankers. You can guess how popular that’ll be with the public. Luckily they’ll just have to learn to live with, respect, and ensure the dignity of Python coders who’ll insist on strict static typing, yet not switch to a strong typed language.

    So why is this so important to uas now?

    Well it sorta makes sense yeah, no one is goo-na b’lieve yah argh intelligent and uh superior race by speaking 36,000 Romance languages, nah you wanna come off as well off in the age of AI, ya goo-na knead aaaaa–t least a few Python mates. It’s obvious picking up yet another human language is pointless when ML can just real time translate it. Reminds me, lets take the piss outta Google again for being right smart bastards. We’ll have 'em pissing in their breaches.

    So i got to chatting with this lady about … well can’t remember much kinda drunk outta my mind at the time. Something like uh, … data frames. So m’ colleagues been saying gotta get tits deep in pandas right. I said ladies, you gotta return the pandas to the Tibetians. They were like i get right on that, then some of 'em be snickering off in the corner. Laughing hahaha we both Chinese.


  • Everyone commenting have read and understood the article. Perhaps the nuance of the conversation is just going over your head. Your commentary is your personal opinion, which is outside of the source material. What you copy+pasted is exactly what we’ve commented on.

    The article never said “reviewing Gnome extensions, where LLM was used, is a huge waste of time”. You are adding to what’s said. The adults are not pulling from outside the article.

    We are stating what the article lacks. We are not hallucinating. So if we are not hallucinating then you must not be following. Reread it a few times until you get it.


  • A saner organization would also hit up submitters for a reviewer’s fee. This would reduce AI spam. Barriers to entry matter.

    A reviewers fee is equivalent to Canonical offering customer support contracts. Obviously a person that needs to lean on AI as a crutch, is just screaming out for reviewers to act as advisers. The reviewer just wielding the giant DENIED stamp is fun, but doesn’t address the issue of noobs implicitly asking to work with a consultant.

    gnome reviewers obviously never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.










  • Wait a sec! Why wouldn’t socialism rely on privacy-invading surveillance? They’d even be more inclined even after getting caught and told no.

    From govts POV, The People are not making sufficient efforts, to protect our own privacy so it’s not a problem.

    Gov’t corps will do whatever they can get away with. We live under “Rule of Lawyerism”, not “Rule of law”.

    Unfortunately we need to make efforts to protect ourselves rather than continue not protecting ourselves.

    The State will never protect you nor does it represent you. We are just marks.