

It’s easy if you see it as intentional sabotage to force more reliance on the private sector.


It’s easy if you see it as intentional sabotage to force more reliance on the private sector.
Honestly if Democrats would drive support sensible gun legislation like exists in Massachusetts. Well let’s be real Republicans would still be outraged because they can’t read but I sure would be much happier.
I haven’t run into any bugs but also I’m not the most intensive user so maybe I just don’t run into them.
I don’t wanna fight, feel how you feel.
Oh I know that and it’s why I included kinks and the only reason it had a heterosexual tint at all is because the question did.
That’s stupid then, no offense. The height of children ranges greatly just like the height of adults, there’s considerable overlap.
It isn’t something clearly defined.
Bless the white text on a black background, thanks for not flash banging me.
I get your meaning. It’s infuriating and exhausting that I have to constantly fight for incremental progress and I hate that there are still terrible actors in the party. That’s why I champion progressives and celebrate every time one gets in.
The fact of the matter is not engaging gets (even more) people killed and I will always hold them accountable but that also means holding myself and the other side accountable. Does it stop at the ballot box? No. You protest, you educate, you arm.
Translation for this person because they’ve rightfully been misunderstood: Why does it seem like there is a disproportionate amount of tall men ending up in relationships with short women? This seems to be a statistical aberration when compared against other factors.
The answer is societal expectations of tall men/short women, kinks, standard height deviations among genders.
I mean, every registered Republican is a bad guy, at least within the last 20 years, probably longer but I don’t have enough historical context to know that for sure. With the Democrats it’s more nuanced but it can range from Chuck Schumer working to continue enabling genocide to Zohran Mamdani working for the people.


He’s working on it. Link
I’m working through self-hosting a public server and will post it here when I can get it through my dummy brain.


Not to mention most of the cost to the average consumer had been refunded via rebates and gst. It was only ever supposed to change the cost perception of carbon intensive products.


I actually caught that one too! I had it edited before I even read it.


China is making strides in cleaning up their grid, it is by no means perfect. They still depend on coal for about 55% of their grid based on the most recently available data I could find, that dropped about 3% last year thanks to their expanding solar network.
I do think our grid is much cleaner especially with our plans for new nuclear reactors. However we do not have the complex manufacturing network that China has.
In saying that we should expand domestic production to strengthen our economic resiliency, especially for needs like housing, food and transportation. This transition can’t be done quickly, doubly so if we’re looking to minimize ecological impact, so in my mind China remains a necessary strategic partner.
Edit: Fixed the statistic for coal use by China, the first source I used wildly underestimated it.


Ending imports from China is not realistic with our economic landscape but we absolutely need denser cities and mass transit.


No such thing as an original idea, we’re iterative. Humans are monkey see, monkey do, even with bigotry.
Is this an LLM, I just cannot fathom these takes being unironic and if they are, please, please go outside.
Or if they were full of poor people. There’s definitely a lot of racists in power but what’s most important to them is money. Money is how they determine their own kind