he/him

  • 27 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 23rd, 2023
  • Ace@feddit.uktoGreentext@sh.itjust.works•Anon watches a video essayEnglish
    20·
    2 days ago

    Use Sponsorblock and enable skipping of “tangents/jokes” (previously called “filler”). It’s off by default but I find it to be a great category to shorten video length without removing any important content.

    And contribute segments where they aren’t already marked, so that others can be saved from these too.

  • Ace@feddit.uktoFediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
    332·
    3 days ago

    I just looked at the actual posts in the community, since I didn’t before. Most of them don’t even look that questionable tbh, although a couple do. But they’re all just naked people posing for the camera. It’s not like they’re dressed as school girls or anything. And every post has the age verification as required by the rule, and most of the images have company watermarks on them. They’re professional shots, not amateur candids. There’s nothing about the posts that implies that the models are underage other than the title of the community. As someone else said, they could be listed as “legal teens” instead and I doubt anyone would bat an eye.

    I also think most people here care more about actual harm than legality.

    Well this post is specifically about the legality, trying to frame it as illegal content. But, that aside, I just don’t see the “actual harm” being done. If visitors are fully aware that they’re looking at adults, and every post explicitly reaffirms the age of the specific model shown, then I don’t see the harm there.

    Should they allow written rape fantasies of minors?

    No, because that’s illegal.

    this is rather normalizing and harm producing

    I just don’t agree with the slippery slope argument. It comes down to saying that “well if they’re looking at 19 and 18 year olds, then next thing is that they’ll be looking at 17 year olds and then 14 year olds!!”. Like I said, there’s a clear line, and getting close to it isn’t the same as crossing it.

  • Ace@feddit.uktoFediverse@lemmy.world•MULTIVERSE has defederated fedinsfw.app for hosting child pornographyEnglish
    1263·
    3 days ago

    eh, I checked the linked community. They have a rule that posters must link to the model’s verification that they’re overage on every post:

    Age verification info for models required; OnlyFans, Fansly profile links are acceptable.

    Seems fine to me. This sounds like a whole lot of virtue signalling and pearl-clutching.

    There’s a very clear line in the sand to me: don’t post anyone underage. Posting overage girls is fine to me no matter what they look like. Should the “small boobs” community also be banned because people might mistake a 25 year old with As for a 15 year old? Come on.

    What a whole lot of nothing. You/they are accusing them of “hosting child pornography” on the basis that they have nude images of proven-overage adults.

    Ragebait title too.