MotoAsh

skavau is a clown

skavau is a clown

skavau is a clown

skavau is a clown

skavau is a clown

Not really. It’s still just a pile of linear algebra. That’s why it doesn’t think or reason or actually understand what it’s outputting.

That’s why all this chasing by executives is a MASSIVE folly: The tech is literally incapable of doing what they think it can.

lol good job advertising your own abysmal media literacy…

Getting roasted because people don’t want their dingdong cut off… +1 for accuracy though.

Throws up a little in my mouth.

… Thanks, I wanted to taste breakfast again!

Is this the DNC’s next campaign?

Yea, several of those things have actual qualitative and quantitative measurements on which they can be compared, but far be it from the common dingdong to think in such lofty terms…

Wait, who the hell is pro genital mutilation!?

… Oh wait, Jews do circumcision… siiiiigghhhh

(I’m also aware some areas of India/middle east do FGM too, but I don’t remember if it’s for anything close to religous reasons)

Who are these dictators that need to meet the guillotine?

I’d definitely say bottom left if you’re going up against someone like a Roman hoplite, or similarly shielded but not so armored opponent. It doesn’t take too much force to fuck up an unarmored arm, which a flail vs shield would be perfect for.

If they’re shielded and armored, though, I don’t think a flail is going to be so great.

Though as with all fighting, if one person is far more skilled than the other, they’re winning most of the time, regardless of (competent) armaments.

Really depends. A good shield used correctly can see a mace weilder dead before they’re really bludgeoning much beyond maybe getting some tingles going in the shield arm.

It’s not really a proof of concept if it doesn’t even meet the only mildly challenging criteria laid out…

You’re getting roasted because you basically did the equivalent of going, “well I asked ChatGPT and it said, [demonstrably wrong answer]”.

The problem with your example is there are traditional algorithms that can do that, and better.

rofl

There are many problems “AI” solves. It’s an excellent tool … for dynamic interfaces, or doing low-risk automation that has very dynamic inputs, or data analysis…

What it’s NOT good at is being creative or logical. It literally cannot do either of those things. Ever. Yet that’s what every fucking brainless executive is trying to use it for…

Soft vore, maaaybe.

Not the hard stuff.