

robin hanson blocked me for referring to him as aella with tenure. i now think that he’s ghislaine maxwell with tenure


robin hanson blocked me for referring to him as aella with tenure. i now think that he’s ghislaine maxwell with tenure


new odium symposium episode. this one is a lot lighter than the previous two. we went back and looked at joseph swetnam, the guy the word misogyny was coined to describe, and how he got relentlessly dunked on by his peers.
https://www.patreon.com/posts/9-first-149546072, or on any platform


new epstein doc release. crashed out for like an hour last night after finding out jeffrey epstein may have plausibly founded /pol/ and that he listened to the nazi “the right stuff” podcast. he had a meeting with m00t and the same day m00t opened /pol/


you have to make your ai antiwoke because otherwise it gets drapetomania


i actually find the content pretty amusing, since it amounts to “have you guys tried using words correctly every once in a while?”


“you should watch [Steven Pinker’s] podcast with Richard Hanania” cool suggestion scott


this happens like clockwork



I often feel like our industry has lost its sense of whimsy and experimentation from the early days, when people tried weird things to see what would work and what wouldn’t.
hard to think of anything more dreary and whimsyless than shoving a rainforest into the gas tank of an llm


New episode of odium symposium, available on all platforms: https://www.patreon.com/posts/8-ceci-nest-pas-148404664
we look at a particular book by french philosopher and murderer louis althusser, and talk about what it can say about femicide


this is so cool


this is very insightful, and it sheds some light for me on something underappreciated: the way in which inceldom is not the same as not having sex. it’s an ideology characterized by misogyny, misanthropy, and a sense of one’s own brokenness, and in particular by a fixation on the sense of unrectifiable loss you describe. people really struggle with the idea that there are incels who have had sex or that someone can not have had sex and not qualify for the label incel.
more generally, chan culture and its offshoots really successfully capitalized upon these tendencies in ways that seem to be underexamined. there’s a reason /lgbt/ attracted so many trans people. if you went through the wrong puberty, you have suffered actual, extremely painful unrectifiable loss, and a culture that recognizes that and encourages wallowing in it can serve an oppositional role to a broader culture that just lies to you about what you’ve experienced. i rarely hear about this and when i do it comes wrapped in moralizing terms like “brain poison” which are in their own way accurate and useful, but which are not sufficient for a complete examination


my experience has been that it’s actually driven primarily by the absolute weirdest ppl you will ever meet, these people having overlap with anything weird you can think of, including antisemitism, wellness fascism, inceldom, MRAs, etc, but not tending to be based particularly in any of those groups.
all of which is unfortunate because i also think they are just correct in their claims that this is a real bodily autonomy issue


update on the grok csam story: the heat on this was not dying down, so X has taken steps to address the issue.
update update: by restricting the csam generator to paying users
update update update: actually they didn’t do that https://www.theverge.com/news/859309/grok-undressing-limit-access-gaslighting


ah fuck, man. reddit.com/r/therapyGPT if you want to ruin your day


unfortunately i don’t think there’s any way to communicate how significant the gap is without coming off as condescending or churlish. but like qaa is probably my favorite podcast and i too am tormented by this


that is who we reached out to. i think rat material would fit extremely well with what they’ve got going on and represents a significant gap in their current coverage


i am so sorry


new odium symposium episode, available on all platforms: https://www.patreon.com/posts/episode-7-whos-147209632
this time we looked at gerald schoenewolfe, a “gender centrist” psychoanalyst. lots of discussion of freud in this one
on a side note, we sent off an email hoping to get a podcast network to fund us to do a miniseries on rationalists. i think there’s basically no chance this sort of cold call works but 🤞🏼
never heard of wokeness, i see