You can use whatever term you like. I generally prefer to speak in terms that people recognize and no one is going to mistake that ethnic cleansing is a good thing.
Incidentally, ethnic cleansing is also inclusive of things like deportation, which is why it’s not just redundant with genocide.
Stop noticing!!! Goyim like you should shut up and go back to work
Not just one dogwhistle, either.
1.3k doesn’t seem hyper specific
One or a couple of people using the word in a slur-like fashion does not make that use not niche. It’s still a niche use, Epstein was just in the habit of using it that way because he was a rabid Jewish supremacist.
I mean, it does get used fucking constantly by white supremacists.
The term “Semitic” doesn’t have the same boundaries as “antisemitic”. “Semitic” can be used to refer to a group of ethnicities including Arabs, Akkadians, Habesha people, etc, gets used to refer to ancient speakers of Semitic languages, and is also of course is used to refer to Semitic languages themselves.
When fascists who hate Jews coined “antisemitic,” they were using “Semite” as a synonym for “Jew,” which is incompatible with any of the definitions given above. As far as I know, they were just trying to sound smart or something.
If you learned Arabic or Hebrew, that would not make you a Semite, just a speaker of a Semitic language for the same reason that if I learned Mandarin or Cantonese, that would not make me Sinitic (i.e. I would tragically still not be Chinese), but just a speaker of a Sinitic language
Because the term “antisemitism” isn’t like an anthropological thing, it’s a term made by people who hated Jews to describe themselves and disparage their opposition as “philosemites”
Missed opportunity to use Mao
They made Wizard of Oz woke!
That’s also where mao (cat) comes from, I’m pretty sure
I feel like somewhere along the line there were people who only approved it because they thought it was a racial slur.
Don’t you think that if a system has you year after year advocating for “moderate” reactionaries who, even by your concessions, are still doing a tremendous deal of net-harm, that destroying the system trying to convince you those are the only two options is a much better use of your time than doing your best to make sure we all bleed out, but slightly slower?
It’s a bad assessment, but that doesn’t make it “weirdly racist”.
Someone who says behind your back to use vibe-code over yours seems like a piece of shit.
Invalidating you passport isn’t nothing unless you plan to just stay there for the rest of your life, which I think the DPRK probably isn’t that interested in.
I do wonder if an American would be useful to them for propaganda purposes, since that has historically been the case and we of course see the inverse 
Ah right
I don’t regard it as important necessarily, but I saw some of the video of the incident, and how the fuck did the hammer guy get acquitted? I’m glad he did, but I don’t understand it.
It’s literally illegal for Americans to go to the DPRK due to American law . . .
Traditionally, Arthur was pretty explicitly post-Roman. And he was Welsh, and fought against Anglo-Saxons.
Originally, but then he was co-opted by the Anglos to be one of their culture heroes, right?
I like the gen 3 games (R/S/E) even if they suffer from the damage type issue like someone else mentioned. Also HG/SS. I’ve been told B2/W2 is the one Pokemon iteration that actually has kind of a good story, but I never played those.
I always feel sad when I see someone incompetently trying to do the “I’m not touching” you style of debatelord tactics. I don’t have any particular reason to believe you’re a kid, but I really hope that you are so that there’s a better chance you grow out of this.