You believe it but you can’t rely on the USSR for a disproof. The USSR has an advantage if the US population doesn’t push for the technological progress to be able to do spaceflight. Then there are no ICBMs and the USSR is more secure.

There are also two centers. One is a balanced society between left and right and the other is a capitalistic hellhole where left and right are fighting to shape a good future while everybody is exploited in the present.

if it never happened, why would the Soviet Union have let the government win the Space Race?

If it never happened, wouldn’t the Soviet Union be the winner? Why disturb the propaganda of the US?

Do pharmaceutical giants not like kicking their competition out the market and securing more profit for themselves?

Don’t car conpanies not like kicking their competition out the market and securing more profit for themselves by offering electric cars and solar cells in the 80ies?

To win the cultural and intellectual battle, Europe must staunchly defend its model,

There is no argument in the article for why this should work in the future.

Europe profited from post colonial structures.

Redistribution is a political decision and possible to continue forever. But was redistribution the source of our prospetity, or just a bribe to buy our silence so that the elite could keep plundering the world?

With competition from China, we can’t keep selling our technology above fair prices. Without those profits will people stay willing to share? Will we be able to maintain culture and education?

It could be interpreted as trust in the Dollar if gold starts falling, too.

reason: AM: Violates Rules

Now you know. /s

If you run her on your hardware she is a sex slave.

Tango Gameworks that they bought only to close off immediately.

but those mistaces appear to be systematic,

Which other systemic goals could they have?

Es ist doch primär ein Schaden für die AfD.

Wenn der AfD Gelder für Mitarbeiter von Abgeordneten zusteht, dann muss die AfD sie völlig frei verwenden können. Selbst wenn Höcke alle Gelder persönlich für sich beanspruchen würde, bleibt dies Sache der AfD. Es sind keine zweckgebundenen Subventionen die veruntreut wurden.

Der Schaden für die AfD besteht darin, dass die AfD wahrscheinlich ihre Gelder nicht bestmöglich verwendet. Es ist Aufgabe der Parteimitglieder, bessere Kandidaten zu finden. Mit besseren Mitarbeitern hätte die AfD jetzt schon in Sachsen-Anhalt bei 50% sein können.

In Norway the crown princess was in the news so this could be an attempt to shift the attention.

Overall, it’s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_the_zone.

Why should there be any independent media? The precision with which we build cars and processors, why should the people not be manipulated with the same level of skills?

The situation is backwards. Trump was chosen by the elite because people accept anything from him and not that people have to expect anything because they have elected Trump.

People worry that Trump gets away and that everything is a distraction from Epstein while Epstein is the distraction. The rich must have known what Epstein did and nobody spilled the beans. What is happening that people shouldn’t talk about?

For the downvoters: the suggarcoating press https://feddit.org/post/25259344

Divide and conquer. Why fight the entire countries or even the union of those three and not some fraction?

The last time the US, Russia and China fought together they fought Nazis, not Germany. Europe should only fight fractions of those countries.

because it’s kust that more easier to breed money when you already have so much.

Warren Buffett says no. To invest billions is more difficult because high growths opportunities with high margins rarely exist in that price range.

Case in point — corpos like Microsoft and Ubisoft.

Are they stupid or do they optimize for different constraints? MS could have introduced AI for surveillance and not for growth.

So when the crisis finally comes, you won’t be able to properly analyze the situation.

I can’t disprove this. However I think that some are intelligent enough and with billions at their disposal they could make themselves heard.

It’s enough that 10 billionaires understand the development to convince the rest.

They think about power all day long. They will notice if they lose it.

2026, when slaves have slaves at home.

Posts from back then:

https://feddit.org/post/4174492

https://feddit.org/post/4105872

Search, for some reason without a direct result for the posts:

https://feddit.org/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Finteractive%2F2024%2F10%2F25+%2Fopinion%2Fwhat-trump-says.html&type=All&listingType=All&page=1&sort=TopAll

Which newspapers don’t do this?

Immensely ironically, we know a lot about that because of Noam Chomsky.

Limited hangout.

Which questions are not asked because Chomsky already gave many answers?

Which newspaper keeps pushing for answers?

It’s not just various but almost all newspapers that don’t push.