My first instinct was to say “cursed,” my second is to think “huh… kind of cute actually”

Hey, thank you so much for helping me! Now I have a better idea of my options and what wants are viable and which are not.

• https://gardinerbryant.com/the-omarchy-framework-thing/
• https://crimier.github.io/posts/Framework-Omarchy/
• https://community.frame.work/t/framework-supporting-far-right-racists/75986/2

TL;DR: Framework is sponsoring Omarchy and Hyprland. Omarchy, at least, is really linked to far-righter DHH; cannot find nearly as much about Hyprland on a quick search besides “toxic”.

Going to be an interesting thread to follow as someone who wants a Framework for the repairability. And friends recommending it; and honestly in a world where social media is probably flooded with astroturfed comments instead of real experience, and review sites are ones I highly doubt actually touched or bothered with the products, I am gonna trust word of mouth. But I can be convinced into reconsidering (price, performance I can get out of a laptop, and the Hyperland/Omarchy thing).

deleted by creator

“For all my projects, the motivation is the same,” Champion told The Register. “We tend to look past the technology that surrounds us and shapes our lives. My work is about forcing us to look at it, and seeing the beauty in engineering.”

Really like this!

I’d love if you posted it here :)

I’ll do it for you as a post on [email protected] (was looking through your profile trying to find our DMs together, turns out that is not where to find them, found this comment though) if you list the smut ones. I’m asexual so not asking for myself, but I’ll definitely make a separate NSFW post for them on !deshittification; the non-asexual portion of the population deserves DRM-free stuff too.

As a gamer who did switch, curious what games are preventing the switch. In my experience sometimes it struggles with indie games only released for Windows that have probably been downloaded maybe 100 times at best; and probably as you know anything with kernel-level anticheat

i have been summoned

Hey thank you for the good information; I starred your comment! This is the stuff I like seeing on programming.dev.

And I have built from source before—but considering how un-knowledgeable I feel compared to the average poster here, probably a good thing you included that reassurance that it’s not so hard, since I feel just barely technical enough to be able to build from source. It’s also friendly to drive-by readers at my level of expertise/knowledge or lower who have not built from source yet.

I’ll freely admit that you know the “did not read the article and still commented” folks?

I’m a “didn’t watch the video” person and had to be told by other people what happened.

Also, at least one of them someone linked me of the foot thing was age restricted so I Xed out and took them at their word.

I’m happy! It Just Works. Windows 11 -> Linux.

• I have had ONE WiFi problem that was my computer’s fault the whole year; as opposed to half the times I open the computer.
• One video game didn’t Just Work, I had to tinker, but I got it working smoothly with mods.
• A bit of trouble with flash drives initially because they were not formatted to something compatible with Linux. Once I learned that I managed to shuffle data around and format it to be compatible with MacOS, Linux, and my Windows VM. But Linux actually saved me and let me get an old flash drive working that did not work at all. Love reformatting on my distro, it’s easier and more visual than when I tried to do it on Mac or Windows.

Hey, thanks for clarifying, I appreciate it!

Picture for people who do not want to click the link.

Am I just colorblind? I see 0%, 42%, 12%, and 1% in red. I see 13%, 12%, and 8% in green. You would have to remove “no change” in 42% for your assertion about green square percentages summing to more than red square percentages; though it does keep your point about drawback vs. benefit percentage true since “no change” is neither good nor bad.

Wasn’t aware he ate from his feet specifically onstage.

Still not going to agree with you, sorry, as someone who does not agree with ridiculing people unless it’s necessary. Of course, I’m not a perfect human being, I have probably unfairly ridiculed people, especially when angry and when pretty sure my target is someone that nobody will argue against me ridiculing. I’m just… as a person who desperately tried to avoid being “the weirdo” and still might fail at avoiding that nowadays? I’m pretty anti-“what a weirdo lmao,” and want people left the fuck alone about their weird behaviors unless they are hurting people with the weird behavior; or they literally will not stop their actual harmful behaviors and ridiculing might have a slight chance to get through or erode the power they have to perform those bad behaviors consequence-free.

I can also admit that people probably do need some level of social judgment to not gross out the people around you, so the eating that onstage probably wasn’t a great move (do not know what happened in context, I’m not very up to date on the whole drama of Richard Stallman). Now I know it was onstage and not some leaked information about his personal life, this does at least make sense as something people would make fun of, especially given I think most people, even the socially inept, would figure out not to do this by 6th grade.

Still probably going to dig in my heels on my belief that in this particular discussion bringing this up after “this guy has dangerous/regressive beliefs” feels a lot more like “and look, he’s weird too!!! what a loser LMAO” gossip and less like a relevant thing we should know about him that can contribute to a useful informative discussion, though. Sorry.

Huh, I read the article and I don’t see anything about more companies experiencing gains than losses. Are you talking about a different article than https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/20/pwc_ai_ceo_survey/?

Only 12 percent reported both lower costs and higher revenue, while 56 percent saw neither benefit. Twenty-six percent saw reduced costs, but nearly as many experienced cost increases.

This is the closest thing I saw.

I think that is one of my problems with AI. People who were once creators, and who were the only means to produce it (either you became a creator by learning the skills or hired a creator to do it) did things. Now that a machine can do it they babysit it at best. If they enjoyed the process of creation, something was lost. I would hate washing clothes by hand and am glad I have a washing machine to do it for me. But if I enjoyed it I am sure I’d have to use the washing machine at a laundromat job because it is more efficient, while lamenting the lost enjoyment from handwashing myself and instead becoming a glorified babysitter. And in my personal life I might not even have the time to wash clothes by hand if I liked it and would keep washing with the machine. Much easier to make time for something if that is the only way it can get done; much easier to have time to handwash clothes when that is the only way you can have clean clothes without buying new.

I admit I now work a non-tech career. And my motivation to do my own hobby projects went way down because “well if AI can do it since it’s greenfield,” but I also do not want to use AI, so nothing gets done. Small hobby project so I could learn would be still building something new only I could do (or that I’d have to hire out). Now if something else can do it I feel like I am handicapping myself so I can learn (even though I have never even used AI to code), which feels very different. Like having to learn math without calculators while knowing they are a possibility, vs. learning math without when calculators are not invented yet so you cannot have that complaint. Yes, I know, abacuses, but I hope you get my point. Going from the project being something only I or someone else with the skills could have done, so it makes sense for me to do it, it was efficient, to “well I have to to learn the skills but it would have been faster to just get AI to do it.” (If that is even true! Maybe I am getting overly influenced by bots pushing AI and it would be faster for ME to do it.) That makes it feel way less motivating to try myself.

And that does not even get into whether AI can even do it. So many comments (that may or may not be bots, not sure) nowadays in dev communities seeming to change their tune from “AI slows me down. It’s faster to do it yourself correctly, making mistakes that are easier to catch, than to use the hallucinator that makes mistakes that look correct so it’s harder to find those mistakes in the first place” to “actually you have to use it, it’s just a tool, and it is getting better every day, get on board or get left behind, maybe it sucks at brownfield projects in industry but it can whip up your hobby project or quick web UI much faster than you can.” Not sure if this is actual people changing opinions as they have more time with the tech and it improves (and is it? Because there are both reports of it getting better, and reports of new models being worse).

“Go try the tools to assess them and form your own opinion then!” I’m fresh out of a CS degree and don’t feel knowledgeable enough in coding to be able to assess if it would be flawed or not. I trust expert opinions (or at least more experienced opinions, which I assume to be most users of programming.dev) over my own, which usually helps but is awful when the experts conflict. As for just learning to code well so I become qualified to judge for myself, I’m still hearing conflicting things! “It’ll speed up your learning x5, it helped me with this thing that otherwise would have taken hours of forumscrolling and trial and error” vs. “it makes so many mistakes, especially when you are learning and do not yet know how to catch the AI mistakes, you shouldn’t use it.” I personally do not feel great about trusting something that (as far as I know) is not actually citing its sources, that does not know and is not speaking from experience. I hate the idea of trusting a black box where I cannot look at the insides and see how it came to that output or ask an expert who knows more than me about what the insides are doing (because yeah, I admit cars are black boxes to me because I do not understand their working, but I know someone does!). I hate the idea of trusting something made to be nondeterministic by design to be correct all the time, or having to be its babysitter-corrected-reviewer instead of just making it myself. But maybe it advanced further than I thought?

End result: too many conflicting ideas, paralysis, do nothing. (And even if AI does actually make you faster, doing it without AI is still infinitely faster than doing nothing.) God I hope typing that conclusion helps motivate me to get back on those projects, building my skills I have not been using at work back up.

I don’t know what to think anymore. Do not want to fight a losing battle and be a stupid Luddite, also recognizing Luddites were not exactly “all tech bad” but “who is the tech doing things for and who is it doing it to,” wanting to get ahead and not have things done to me without also promoting use of a tool that does things to others. Not wanting to get automated out of a job, “you’re so smart andioop, you are sure to get a good job!” only to see knowledge workers threatened while being autistic so the social skills are not so hot (I can work on improving! But I feel I’ll probably never approach the level of a non-autistic person applying the same effort, nor will I ever get some nonverbal cues) and not liking the idea of manual labor… also recognizing that people who can change things do not care about the people getting automated out of a job so I have to figure out how to reskill while having a full-time job, into something that will not just be automated away too (but everything I am good at is stuff people claim AI can do). Thinking about how disruptors, even of men-in-the-middle, not only can take out fat cats but also little guys like me who learned how to do that kind of job, so maybe being forced to do something else for society is good, but also that families and lives depend on a job and the unregulated surveillance capitalism society I live in does not always have us doing meaningful work that contributes to something useful for society so maybe the disruption does not actually force us to pick something more useful to society now.

Still don’t like AI, but also scared of being wrong and getting eaten because of my own bias and not being willing to move on and change with the times at the old age of my 20s. Also not even sure how to change with the times.

Is he one of those awful people who the civil route has been tried with and did not work, and the (seemingly) only way to chip away at their power is to make fun of them and call them weird?

No personal investment in the dude, but this reads more like finding an acceptable target to punch on now that a claim he is dangerous has been made. Now he is wide open to “lol what a weirdo!” that would be seen as just irrelevant bullying if there wasn’t the claim he has regressive and harmful views. Now anyone who points out “hmm maybe bringing that up is mean, and not a good practice for debate” can be shut up with “are you really defending this awful person? That means you are on his side…”

It is useful to spread information of when someone’s dangerous, so people do not get hurt, like the link already posted by someone else here, detailing his views that align with pedophilia, and one I found that has depressingly predictable remarks a person with pedophilic-justifying beliefs might make about Epstein victims. But who cares about what he does with his toes?

I am also reminded of . Our entire problem with him is the pedophilia-justifying views and not weird but harmless personal habits. Not whatever toe thing he does.

checked community, this specific instance of the post is Opensource and not Europe or Denmark so I think it’s okay for me to open my American mouth and say: I hope they manage to resist. If Denmark can put up a successful fight, there is hope for the rest of us, including the Americans being crushed under Big Tech.

deleted by creator