Please have a second read of our Code of Conduct which you agreed to follow when signing up to our instance. Being purposefully hostile is not in line with that agreement.

Please follow our instance’s Code of Conduct and avoid using slurs, repeated breaches will lead to a temporary ban from our instance.

Hi

Can you update the title to be the same as the updated title in the news article?

The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment

Please remember to follow our Code of Conduct, making unprovoked insults will lead to admin action. Continued breaches will eventually lead to temporary and permanent ban. for more information, see https://legal.programming.dev/docs/administration-guidelines/#protocols

Please follow our instance’s Code of Conduct when engaging with our communities and try to avoid using insults. Repeated breaches will lead to temporary ban from our instance.

Hi, I’ve sent you a new DM

Hey

Please check your DMs, you got unresolved reports from c/linux

Please respect our instance’s Code of Conduct when interacting with our communities. Repeated breaches on admin moderated communities will lead to temporary instance-wide ban.

For the last ~2 weeks the infrastructure team have been actively investigating performance with our server and actions are currently being taken. You should expect us to post an announcement with more detailed information soon™.

It’s not helping if some bitch on her menstrual cycle comes and spams her keyboard without any valid points

You’ve already previously been given warning for breaching our Code of Conduct section 3.5 (Hate Speech: Do not make remarks directed at sex, gender…). This is your third strike within 2 months and your account is now at risk of receiving a permanent ban if further breaches are made within 365 days.

Since this is strike 3, your account will be given a 14 days site-wide temporary ban.

- The programming.dev community team

If you don’t have anything positive or helpful to say, it would be better to just not reply. If you think the post shouldn’t be posted here, use the report function instead.

Please don’t stalk/harass our users, it can and will lead to a site wide ban if reported.

When on communities hosted by programming.dev, please follow our Code of Conduct. Repeated breaches of our CoC will lead to a temporary ban from our instance.

https://old.reddit.com/user/Ulrik-HD/

Got it. I saw that Vacant was then in the mod list, I’ve transferred the community to you (based on seniority) and removed Vacant from the moderator list.

Hi, is the other moderator inactive/stepping away?

Just a reminder that section “3.6. Vote Manipulation” of programming.dev’s CoC prohibits targeted downvotes and mass downvoting of posts. You’ve already broken it by mass downvoting JokeDeity’s old posts, please don’t break it further. If you keep breaking our CoC, a temporary ban may be given.

It is a precautionary policy to avoid what is currently just a theoretical. You’ll be the first to create personal blog community so it will be interesting to see how it works out.

Nothing is set in stone of course and policies may be revised, I won’t make any claim that the current set of guidelines are perfect and immutable.

The intention of requiring a 3rd party to act as a moderator is to avoid mod abuse from the blog author such as deleting comments or banning people for unreasonable reasons. E.g. someone correcting an error in a blog post and then having their comment deleted and banned by the author in retaliation.

Ideally Lemmy would have more granular level of mod authorisation so that we could just remove access to deleting and banning people.

If someone makes a non-relevant post in the community, it would be removed. If it becomes a recurring problem, we can look into automating that process.