Why does it need to be a dedicated park? They’re not proposing getting rid of all the green stuff. Even better than having green stuff some distance away is living in the middle of the green stuff.
Look at the picture. There’ll be not much green left. They’ll only leave the trees alone and based on the figure of 40 000 new residents the buildings will be taller than the trees. I don’t think that is great.
Cities are more livable when there are parks every few blocks. I mean big ones, at least half a mile long. People need nature, not a tree here and there.
Why building something on it instead of converting it into a park? People love green stuff, you know.
Why does it need to be a dedicated park? They’re not proposing getting rid of all the green stuff. Even better than having green stuff some distance away is living in the middle of the green stuff.
deleted by creator
Interesting idea. I’m not sure if that works everywhere but it’s a start. :)
Look at the picture. There’ll be not much green left. They’ll only leave the trees alone and based on the figure of 40 000 new residents the buildings will be taller than the trees. I don’t think that is great.
Cities are more livable when there are parks every few blocks. I mean big ones, at least half a mile long. People need nature, not a tree here and there.
Exactly, this is why we should legalise weed!
I think the proposed homes near the highway should be forested as a buffer.
Because rich people need money to build a bigger golf course somewhere else
Removed by mod
In lots of cities vacancy rates are too low making it hard to find housing
This particular golf course is a park. Seattle Parks and Rec uses a management company, but it is one of the cheapest ways to play.
https://premiergc.com/-jackson-park-golf-course