• bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s filled with stuff then it’s not filled with air. So it would be less buoyant. But yeah, probably harder to sink than people would guess

      • Paradux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        76
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bouyancy is based on how much water is displaced, not amount of air inside the container. 66x12x13=10,296 cubic inches. Fresh water density is about 0.0361 lb/in^3 so that case has to displace at least 372 lb to sink.

        Metric would be better for this but we’re talking about a stinger missile here.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 day ago

          I read your comment, then went to make a joke response to someone else about placing a vacuum chamber inside the case to reduce its buoyancy.
          This set off a several minute long internet hunt where I learned about Archimedes Principle, which you clearly describe. It turns out the only vacuum here is the one in my head.

          To wit: If placed inside the case, my empty head would reduce the buoyancy, but only by its own weight.
          A Pyrrhic victory.

          • Paradux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            My boy Archie figured some stuff out a long time ago! Unfortunately he didn’t get the story straight about phlogiston

  • fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What I want to know is how on earth you would find it again if you did this. There’s no guarantee that it’ll be in the same spot, right? It can get buried or pushed way downstream or both. I’d believe it if it was like a retention pond or something, but a river?

    • Gerblat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’d probably tie a rope to it, very securely, then secure the other end of the rope to a tree or rock or something on the river bank/shore, as low to the ground as possible, then cover the visible section of rope with mud/sticks/branches etc.

      Still no guarantee it wouldn’t break free or be discovered by someone else though

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who needs healthcare when MIC surplus waste can store your belongings for slightly cheaper…

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      From context I presume that at some universities you may not return to the same dorm room, and so need to pack up your stuff and move out at the end of the school year and then back in later. Universities or nearby businesses must take advantage of this by renting storage space to students.

      I never lived on or near campus so I don’t have any first hand knowledge.

      • gigachad@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess we are talking about the US? That means students rent their dorms not during the breaks, and go back home. Are they forced to go into dorms or can they also just rent an apartment?

        • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is typical of US. Most dorms don’t allow staying over breaks. It’s almost impossible to find month to month or short term leasing to even get into an apartment for breaks, so you most likely find a couch to crash on or move back home. It’s a massive pain in the ass

    • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, if you’ve got the stinger case all packed up, is it really that big a deal to just toss it in the trunk? Maybe they spent the time traveling though, in which case I get it more.

      • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pic doesn’t show size well, think small coffin. Only way you’re tossing that bad boy in the trunk is if you drive a 1970s luxo-barge

        • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unless it’s a station wagon it’s not going in.

          Source: had a couple of luxo barges when they were cheap to buy and not too expensive to run

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on how they’re getting home, right? If they planned to take a cheap flight with nothing but hand luggage, there’s no way they’re getting that thing on the plane without paying extra. And if they’re getting a ride from someone else, they may not have the trunk space for that either.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are you saying this isn’t a much cooler story? Fun people will genuinely do something less optimal for the chance to be more entertaining, and I think they’re probably right.