I don’t think that definition of slur is correct. I’d argue that any word that is being used insultingly to refer to a subset of the population is a slur. Using a shortened version of the scientific term without malice to describe someone couldn’t ever be seen as a slur, even if some people didn’t like being called it. Unless it’s common to use it derogatorily, I don’t think that you can call any descriptive word a slur. Since ‘cis’ is just the Latin opposite of ‘trans’, it’s pretty clear that it isn’t meant to be derogatory.
Even if I personally felt offended when anyone called me “tall”, I don’t think I could categorize that as a slur because I am tall and that’s the word that is commonly used to describe my height without intent to offend.












As soon as I got a bike path near my home that led to my grocery store, I stopped driving to the grocery store. This only happened when two bike routes were linked together, since I live off an arterial street. You either have to be willing to put in a huge stretch of bike lanes all over, all at once, or be willing to put up with a few stretches of underutilized bike lane until enough are added that they become usable. With your mindset, you could never go from no bike support to having bike supporting infrastructure.