ruby.git - The Ruby Programming Language

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2023-12-04	[ruby/syntax_suggest] Update standardrb to Ruby 3.0 standards	Schneems
	https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/commit/2771dcabe0
2023-05-23	Manually merge syntax_suggest-1.1.0	Hiroshi SHIBATA

2023-05-23	[ruby/syntax_suggest] Fix	schneems
	https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/pull/187 Handle if/else with empty/comment line Reported in #187 this code: ``` class Foo def foo if cond? foo else # comment end end # ... def bar if @recv end_is_missing_here end end ``` Triggers an incorrect suggestion: ``` Unmatched keyword, missing `end' ? 1 class Foo 2 def foo > 3 if cond? > 5 else 8 end 16 end ``` Part of the issue is that while scanning we're using newlines to determine when to stop and pause. This is useful for determining logically smaller chunks to evaluate but in this case it causes us to pause before grabbing the "end" that is right below the newline. This problem is similar to https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/pull/179. However in the case of expanding same indentation "neighbors" I want to always grab all empty values at the end of the scan. I don't want to do that when changing indentation levels as it affects scan results. There may be some way to normalize this behavior between the two, but the tests really don't like that change. To fix this issue for expanding against different indentation I needed a way to first try and grab any additional newlines with the ability to rollback that guess. In #192 I experimented with decoupling scanning from the AroundBlockScan logic. It also added the ability to take a snapshot of the current scanner and rollback to prior changes. With this ability in place now we: - Grab extra empties before looking at the above/below line for the matching keyword/end statement - If there's a match, grab it - If there's no match, discard the newlines we picked up in the evaluation That solves the issue. https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/commit/513646b912
2023-05-23	[ruby/syntax_suggest] Refactor Scanner logic out of AroundBlockScan ↵	schneems
	introduce history AroundBlockScan started as a utility class that was meant to be used as a DSL for scanning and making new blocks. As logic got added to this class it became hard to reason about what exactly is being mutated when. I pulled the scanning logic out into it's own class which gives us a clean separation of concerns. This allowed me to remove a lot of accessors that aren't core to the logic provided by AroundBlockScan. In addition to this refactor the ScanHistory class can snapshot a scan. This allows us to be more aggressive with scans in the future as we can now snapshot and rollback if it didn't turn out the way we wanted. The change comes with a minor perf impact: before: 5.092678 0.104299 5.196977 ( 5.226494) after: 5.128536 0.099871 5.228407 ( 5.249542) This represents a 0.996x change in speed (where 1x would be no change and 2x would be twice as fast). This is a 0.38% decrease in performance which is negligible. It's likely coming from the extra blocks being created while scanning. This is negligible and if the history feature works well we might be able to make better block decisions which is means fewer calls to ripper which is the biggest bottleneck. While this doesn't fix https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/issues/187 it's a good intermediate step that will hopefully make working on that issue easier. https://github.com/ruby/syntax_suggest/commit/ad8487d8aa