

But v4.69.31.81 is higher version than v4.68


But v4.69.31.81 is higher version than v4.68


sadly no, but it is on all platforms and at least more secure than other closed source messenger


I’ve never understood why a messaging app would require blockchain to function. Storing all text and images on the blockchain seems redundant—especially when end-to-end encryption is already in place. With E2EE, no one can modify your messages without access to your private key.
It’s a shame they broke Perfect forward secrecy. To me, this is a very important feature to have in any E2EE system.


well briar does not have calling on desktop (in stable yet at least), also jami can do video and screen share
that’s good to know.
what most p2p chats lack is users.
Exactly. In order to attract more users to Jami, I really think the user interface should be improved.
session is not p2p.
you are right, Session is not purely peer-to-peer.


thanks!


thanks a lot!
Syncthing doesn’t only work on LAN, it can work through any network interface including Tailscale and yggdrasil, and has public relay nodes in case you don’t. I’m pretty sure you can also host your own relay nodes if you want to.
didn’t know this, thank you!


agree, please prove the governments of Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea are terrorists


waste of resources
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: waste of resources is better than terrorism
people are obviously scared
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: they shouldn’t be and I’m not scared.


Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…


Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…


Why is that? Surveillance can still be helpful if all people are targeted.


More surveillance = more crime detected, do I need to prove 1+1=2 for you as well?


Thanks, though Reticulum and Arweave can be a bit difficult to use, not sure what exe to download and what platforms are supported


If you are having trouble understanding, ask


People who use Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram are protected by the law, but they are also bound by the law at the same time. They do not materially benefit from government actions related to terrorism, and it is not in their interests to support them.
Many people accept surveillance because it does not seem to affect their daily lives, and not fully realize they are being deprived of their privacy.
Please help provide arguments against - surveillance does not significantly impact daily life and can be beneficial for national security.


Edited:
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: We do not have to choose between security and privacy, nor should we accept surveillance being used purely for profit. Instead, we can strengthen regulations and legal safeguards to ensure that surveillance is used responsibly and only for legitimate purposes.
Can you provide an argument for “Even with proper regulations, individuals’ emails and messages should not be accessible to governments.”


thanks a lot!


any guide on how to start using it?
https://blip.net/
This doesn’t seem to be open source