Profile pic

tengkuizdihar, tengkuizdihar@programming.dev

Instance: programming.dev
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 4
Comments: 45

RSS feed

Posts and Comments by tengkuizdihar, tengkuizdihar@programming.dev




they do? you go to the settings, home screens, and increase the dock rows.



There’s already peer to peer, anonymous, network that’s ready to be used on top of other existing tech like mastodon… This one is a grifter-filled, cryptobros, toys that only benefits those who seek short term profits. Don’t buy into this.



im not sure codeberg currently had the infrastructure to support day-to-day operation of nixpkgs development. I’m using codeberg daily for my own projects, and sometimes the diff for MR is broken or load for too long. Not mentioning stability issues.

Of course I wouldn’t complain of something thats maintained by volunteers. I’m just saying the traffic for nixpkgs are currently big and I’m pessimistic codeberg can handle it.



from the letter

What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free?

Im all for giving fair or even plentiful compensation to developers who made our softwares. But, how times and hindsight made this passage sounds like, “wait you guys got paid?”



lokinet is for data transfer, like a message from your phone to mine, not a currency. Thats why its odd it uses staking instead of any nodes.


yet they couldve done this with volunteer nodes or even their own, because not even the server knows the content, right?


i concur, let me carry EVERYTHING, let me do my thing on the fly


shame their entire node system relies on cryptobros tech.

tor doesnt need currency to back it up.
i2p doesnt need currency to back it up.
why the hell lokinet does?



thank you for this explanation, it gave me the right perspective. I will check that channel out!


Now about that fab line, is that still protected under a secrecy license? What’s stopping the Chinese from making their own fab line besides the ASML monopoly?


yeah, comment above really gave me a picture that 16nm is really small


yes, but fabricating a CPU on a small enough form factor is still an issue, afaik


RSS feed

Posts by tengkuizdihar, tengkuizdihar@programming.dev

Comments by tengkuizdihar, tengkuizdihar@programming.dev




they do? you go to the settings, home screens, and increase the dock rows.



There’s already peer to peer, anonymous, network that’s ready to be used on top of other existing tech like mastodon… This one is a grifter-filled, cryptobros, toys that only benefits those who seek short term profits. Don’t buy into this.



im not sure codeberg currently had the infrastructure to support day-to-day operation of nixpkgs development. I’m using codeberg daily for my own projects, and sometimes the diff for MR is broken or load for too long. Not mentioning stability issues.

Of course I wouldn’t complain of something thats maintained by volunteers. I’m just saying the traffic for nixpkgs are currently big and I’m pessimistic codeberg can handle it.



from the letter

What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free?

Im all for giving fair or even plentiful compensation to developers who made our softwares. But, how times and hindsight made this passage sounds like, “wait you guys got paid?”



lokinet is for data transfer, like a message from your phone to mine, not a currency. Thats why its odd it uses staking instead of any nodes.


yet they couldve done this with volunteer nodes or even their own, because not even the server knows the content, right?


i concur, let me carry EVERYTHING, let me do my thing on the fly


shame their entire node system relies on cryptobros tech.

tor doesnt need currency to back it up.
i2p doesnt need currency to back it up.
why the hell lokinet does?



thank you for this explanation, it gave me the right perspective. I will check that channel out!


Now about that fab line, is that still protected under a secrecy license? What’s stopping the Chinese from making their own fab line besides the ASML monopoly?


yeah, comment above really gave me a picture that 16nm is really small


yes, but fabricating a CPU on a small enough form factor is still an issue, afaik