• 11 Posts
  • 145 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2025

help-circle







  • This made me wonder do uncontacted peoples have microplastics in them in large amounts like we all do? Like say the Sentinelese, for instance? I’m sure they do have some at least, despite them not using it, but maybe not nearly to the extent we do? This isn’t me advocating for using uncontacted peoples for studies and so on, obviously that’s not a moral way to go at all. Just a curiosity thing. If so, then if this is the huge ticking time bomb we suspect it might be then maybe we’ll all die off and they’ll be pretty much the only ones left. Maybe even unaware for the most part that we all died off. Yeah I’m just rambling at this point…




  • Yeah I have to agree that simply labeling people as this is reductive and doesn’t help things. There are valid reasons for not being in the EU from a left wing perspective, and the reasons for voting for Brexit are wide. I believe that it was wrong of us to leave. But we shouldn’t simply attack and insult people for voting for us to leave when there are various longstanding socioeconomic conditions that have led to it. Racism/xenophobia was a big factor, sure, and the people that voted for it based off that are bad. But it’s far from the only reason. The problem is that so much of our situation, or what could have been our situation, has been put down to us being in/not being in the EU. We can address those socioeconomic conditions that led to the leave vote winning without being in the EU. Unfortunately we haven’t had a government since the vote that’s been willing to do what needs to be done








  • Ahh I see fair enough! Yeah you’re right that Corbyn’s opinion isn’t the law of YP but that’s still encouraging. As much as I see issues with YP I don’t see them as an overall bad entity at all. And in my opinion the priority needs to be an antifascist coalition, in both the electoral and community levels. I’m sure there are many (hopefully most) in both parties that feel the same


  • Are they a very centrist membership, especially since Polanski became leader and the massive influx of new members after that? He won with a huge majority over the centrist candidates and the amount of members has almost trebled since he won. And has he had a particularly centrist political history? He used to be a Lib Dem sure but he left them in 2017. If he’s still pushed for centrist policies in recent years then I’d like to know about it. But either way he clearly isn’t a centrist now. The difference between him and Starmer is that the Greens are far more democratic than Labour and the members can make the party have a left wing agenda, regardless of the leader’s views. Starmer won the leadership on a centre-left platform and then showed he’s actually right wing further down the line. But any left wing Labour members have very little power to influence party policy

    And also have Your Party said they’re willing to have electoral agreements with the Greens? From what I’ve seen so far the implication from YP is that they wouldn’t. But I’d be happy to be wrong


  • Your Party are an explicitly socialist party and want to replace capitalism with socialism. The Greens are a social democratic party (actual social democrats, not the faux ones that the majority of “social democratic” European parties are). That isn’t to say there aren’t socialist members of the Greens, probably most of them are. I’m one of them. There’s just a lot of reasons not to support Your Party even if you are socialist, as I see it