

This is the technological equivalent of the Plot in Jurassic World: Dominion …


This is the technological equivalent of the Plot in Jurassic World: Dominion …
JeOS is just part of Ubuntu Server now
Kubuntu is Kinda a thing?
Linux is Linux
Manjaro is Megafun
NixOS … is Now?
OpenSuse is Open
I got nothing for ‘p’


They already said as soon as it exits the butthole, you can name it.


I like any shitpost that comes with a dissertation defending that it is, in fact, a shitpost.

Linux From Scratch


Laughs in AC/DC Model Trains and Battletech


This is the kind of seriously gross and morally bankrupt content I come here for.
No, that was 1885. 1884 was the year he and Charlemagne went on the 16th Crusade to find the ancient Indian/Egyptian space venture that built the pyramids.


First, I admire you for the heart, depth, and character you bring to this role. My question relates to Klingon culture and in-universe development. Star Trek has a rich history of having “flagship characters” for the important cultures (You, Worf, and B’ellana for the Klingons, Spock, Tuvok, and T’Pol for the Vulcans, Deanna and Lwaxana Troi for Betazed, etc.)
What has been the hardest part about redefining Klingon culture post burn? and what defining in-universe moment changed the Klingons the most in the last ~1000 years?
Qapla’! (Also thank you! but Klingon doesn’t have a word for that…)


I think you’re right, I was more replying to the comment at hand.


You know, that’s a good point that I did forget…
Each eye has around one and a half to twice as many neurons (high estimates put the number between 120 and 150k, low estimates at 75-110k), roughly, as the heart. Ergo, I exist in my Stomach, Two Eyes, and my Brain more than anywhere else in the body? Also, depending on some estimates, the lumbosacral plexus has more neurons than the heart (150,000 for motor control of each leg, give or take depending on well-known estimates)… So my thighs aren’t just thick, they’re also a seat of neurological control.
We also have like 8 Ganglion clusters (sub brains, if you will) that allow for autonomic control of organs when BigBrain :tm: isn’t functioning correctly.
Also, at best there is a strong (but increasingly weak in larger studies) correlation between Neuron count and neurofunctional complexity. It helps to read more literature than the one paper that is found to support a chosen argument…
https://d-nb.info/1332809901/34
https://karger.com/bbe/article/99/2/109/860281/The-Relationship-between-Cognition-and-Brain-Size
To the point of this: It is not “neuro-reductionist” to focus on the brain as the seat of Neurology in the human body. Take away the brain entirely and we know that these substructures stop computing. No one involved in the study of neurology thinks we are entirely in our own brains, but they do think the brain is the core element of human neurology.


Clever to try and make this about a woman’s right to use birth control (which also implies the corollary of a woman’s right to not use it.), but your assertion is that the population control is necessary.
Controlling things means making people comply when they don’t.
Also, what’s you’re goal here: To have people just decide to choose not to have kids? In your mind what people should choose not to have kids? What happens when people choose to have kids anyway?
Which is, you know, how biology and biological systems work. As long as people exist: they’re gonna fuck. When they fuck, there are gonna be kids.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS BORIS


Your response, combined with your original statement of
Population control is necessary
brings us to:
See question 2: which group of people do you want to tell aren’t allowed to have kids?


Ok, just to speed this along: Any discussion that starts this way will eventually come to the questions:
Who do you want to remove from the populations?
Who do you want to prevent from having children?
If we just open the conversation with this question, we can find out what your real motivation is here.


I think that Fläming-Skate might also count, but it isn’t exactly for Bikes.


Based.
posted from my Fairphone 5
“Immense opportunities for applying then … in the private sector.”
What possible mode of profit are they looking at with this research?