Absolutely, yes :D

This morning, I realised that I even could find a positive spin for Spahn becoming president. Just imagine him being forced in that neutral, non-party, dignified position for a very long time. Instead of meddling in daily politics, he’d be forced to meet heads of state in front of his palace. Instead of establishing lucrative connections with the industry and establishing himself as an important figure in the party, he’d be sidelined to give New Year’s Addresses. It would put a sudden stop to all his ambitions to merchandise himself. His political career would be completely destroyed by becoming the nominally most important man that unfortunately has his hands tied in every aspect he likes to use them. :)

They’re licking Putins boot more because he’s the russian dictator, not because he’s rich.

The difference being? Both being a dictator and being rich are leading to the same thing: being powerful; and that’s the sole reason to get one’s boots licked.

and the german Left is not explicitly licking Putin’s boot at all

“At all” is probably a bit bold of a claim. Granted, with Wagenknecht leaving ship and taking her most avid followers with her, the most prominent “Russian” voice in that party is gone. But you still find a remarkably strong foundation of sympathies towards Russia in that party. No other normal party is as soft on Russia as them. That weird fixation of not giving Ukraine any weapons at all is exactly testament of trying to appease this part of the party that might have gotten quieter but still exists, while still fulfilling the expectations of especially the new influx of members/voters that are no longer filled with these crude nostalgic sympathies. I hope the Linke can overcome this but only time will tell.

They’re so obsessed with ‘overcoming the system’ that they don’t care whatsoever who to share the bed with to - allegedly - reach that goal.

That their great benefactor doesn’t want them to reach their - or any - goal at all but just plays them like a puppet master to sow constant dissent, is beyond their scope of understanding. Useful idiots.

But where’s the hope coming from if you, as in the video above, can clearly see that they absolutely love to lick that boot squeaky clean?

Given that Putin also is a billionaire, aren’t they also billionaire bootlickers?

Problem is when that idiot finds an increasing number of other idiots voting for them…

Poor Friedrich Merz… that way, just as he finally managed to overcome the ignominy of his eternal nemesis Merkel blocking his political career for decades, by catching up with her and becoming Chancellor at last, she will yet again move ahead of him and become someone that’ll be greeted before him. LOL!

That’s Sophie Chikirou of La France Insoumise (LFI), the leading French left-wing populist party. Apparently, she’s also in a relation with the party’s founder and long-term leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon, so also quite ‘prominent’.

Yea, no.

The writing’s been on the wall for ages.

If you, as a major car manufacturer, still decide to outsource production there and now face the consequences of your own actions: that’s on you.

Geothermie (keine Ahnung ob das der korrekte deutsche Begriff hier ist)

Ist es :)

Mittlerweile versucht sich der Lobbyismus nicht mal mehr zu verbergen, sondern tritt direkt ungeniert für alle sichtbar mit offenem Visier auf.

“Those who close their minds to China’s enormous market and innovation potential are missing out on great opportunities for global growth and economic success.”

Haha! We don’t close our “minds to China’s enormous markets and innovation potential” but simply understood that China itself is not interested in fostering foreign car makers on their domestic market in anything beyond short term but only wants to further milk them right now until they can produce it themselves.

Business in China is on borrowed time and anyone that can plan for more than three years should minimise dependencies and exposure on that market as fast as possible.

But obviously that’s something neither China nor managers solely interested in short term profits and stock markets want to hear right now. So we’ll keep on reading stories like these.

Don’t be. That judge is the brightly shining beacon showing us what happens when you’re cut out of access to US services. A wake-up call for many many people that thought they were safe.

I heard from numerous companies that cite this example specifically when implementing first steps to reconsider how their daily routines would suffer without access to US services.

Wouldn’t surprise me if the sanctions agains that judge actually economically backfire.

“Jeden Tag steht ein Dummer auf” galt halt auch schon vor hunderten Jahren: zusammengedichtetes Gesundheitsversprechen + merkwürdiges Produkt = Profit.

Europa diskutiert über eine gemeinsame nukleare Aufrüstung. Aber wie soll man so die übrige Welt glaubwürdig von Atomwaffensperrverträgen überzeugen?

Sehe nicht, wie Europa die Verantwortung dafür tragen soll, dass die Glaubwürdigkeit von Atomwaffensperrverträgen erodiert ist.

Das Kernproblem sind die großen Atom- und Vetomächte, die einerseits nach ihrem Gusto konsequenzenlos Kriege gegen nicht nuklear bewaffnete Staaten führen, andererseits aber auch ihren Verteidigungszusagen nicht mehr nachkommen wollen. Ein Europa, das einerseits einen Angriffskrieg durch eine Atommacht erlebt, andererseits von der anderen Atommacht aber nicht mehr glaubwürdig geschützt wird, kann gar nicht anders, als dann selber über eigene Atomwaffen zu diskutieren. Und das ist auch kein rein europäisches Problem: in Zeiten, in denen sich die “großen Atomhegemone” immer weniger um den Interessenausgleich mit den Nicht-Atom-Staaten scheren, bleibt nur das eigene Nachziehen zur Verteidigung der eigenen Interessen.

ein Parteiverbot würde ja auch keine Nachfolgepartei verhindern.

Ein Parteiverbot erschreckt sich explizit auch auf Nachfolgeorganisationen.

Für uns mag das Abschreckung sein, für die ist das Ansporn…

(¬‿¬)

Es macht dann Sinn, wenn man sich überlegt, dass diese Frau ausschließlich im Interesse der großen Stromkonzerne agiert.