So it scrolls then?

No but there’s doom swiping

Sounds really sleazy.

Putting the whole married thing aside: Early twenties? gross, whatever the situation or the way he flirts. Late twenties? I suppose it could be okay. However if he’s literally constantly hitting on every single cute-ish young woman, but never with older women, it’s very problematic.

And a married man should avoid flirting unless 1- his wife is okay with it and 2 - not only he avoids hiding it, but he is very upfront about the fact that he is married.

Now if a guy such as you described exceptionally finds himself flirting with one young or very young woman in extra-ordinary circumstances, not a huge deal (as long as he doesn’t behave like a jerk).

Yes, but we never needed to tell cats what to do, we just needed them to stick around and do what they do naturally : catch mice

In general terms, it isn’t really. Or at least it is a controversial topic still subject to discussion.

https://opensource.org/blog/public-domain-is-not-open-source

As to this specific topic, the fact that all of the code has to be open source is part of the 10 criteria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Definition

As such, you can’t consider open source the public domain portions of a codebase that also has proprietary portions.

They’re more efficient than old school ac-dc linear supplies (of which an ac transformer is just a part of). However if you just want to step up or down ac voltage, transformers are quite efficient.

He had to relinquish his title! The horror! Have you no sympathy?

Ah yes. I knew I wasn’t going to make many friends with that comment but I think it’s an honest appraisal of what both sides think of each other. 😆

Kdr?

No worries 😉

Please note that I’m not the guy who snarkily posted that he « sees computer inside ». Also note that I expressed no opinion on the choice of name, which is in my opinion is very appropriate.

I was just replying to the guy who stated that LMNC used « only analog circuits » which is completely false.

When we’re talking electronic circuits, analog/digital does not mean computer-less/computer, you seem to be reasonably clear on this. And when it comes to the audio world, it’s the same. I can have a DAW-less 100% digital production rig : digital synths into a digital mixer, tracked to digital tape (or whatever other digital medium), using digital outboard fx.

Now yes, you are right, in laymen terms, LMNC does not use a computer (well he probably does to edit his videos but whatever XD), I think I was quite clear about this in my comment. But claiming that LMNC does use computers is not false per say either - although definitely snarky or pedantic.

Lemmy.world is a den full of libs who will wholeheartedly approve of any meager band-aid solutions over the festering wounds of our western economic systems, even if it continues to make it worse, provided it’s not quite as terrible as whatever the fascists over the other side of the aisle propose.

Lemmy.ml is a den full of marxist-leninist tankies who will wholeheartedly support any authoritarian and imperialist regime provided it’s an enemy of most imperialist state of them all : the USA.

Of course he doesn’t have an actual PC running Windows, masOS or Linux but he absolutely has some digital circuitry in his rig, and some of it probably fit the normal definition of a computer (a cpu with some ram running a program saved in memory).

That LCD for example… analog lcd drivers just don’t exist.

Not controversial topics but apparently some random tokens can make LLMs go berserk

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8viQEp8KBg2QSW4Yc/solidgoldmagikarp-iii-glitch-token-archaeology

IMHO mathematicians go into the madman category.

We actually have a decent idea, around 219,890 tons.

https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data/how-much-gold

Anything can be a conductor if the signal is strong enough

I’m pretty certain most will unironically say this. Or hold this up as proof that you shouldn’t use a consumer level interface because you can’t even distinguish mud from banana.

Do people struggle that much more to divide dollars compared to feet?

I mean I totally get that base 12 is pretty cool for calculator-less maths (though not as cool for base 60) but ultimately, we still have a base 10 numbering system.

So yea, base 10 units for base 10 numbers. Using the same all the way down makes it easier to learn how to handle the more complicated divisions in all cases, you don’t have to switch logic if you see what I mean.

Of course, to each their own. The best case for metric remains that it’s the system everyone else has agreed on.