Not quite how copyright law works. Photoshop and similar gives you copyright because it captures your expression.
An LLM is more like work-for-hire but unlike a human artist it doesn’t qualify for copyright protection and therefore neither does you
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
Not quite how copyright law works. Photoshop and similar gives you copyright because it captures your expression.
An LLM is more like work-for-hire but unlike a human artist it doesn’t qualify for copyright protection and therefore neither does you
There’s already rulings on this holding that the prompt for all LLM or image generator isn’t enough to count the result as the human’s expression, thus no copyright (both in USA and other places)
You need both human expression and creative height to get copyright protection
Not how copyright works. Adding something with creative height together with something without leaves the combined work with ownership only of the part with creative height with the rest unprotected.
(bots can not achieve creative height by definition in law)


Yes.
Meanwhile intelligence agencies says they want to stop encryption to help them investigate crime…


Lobbyists selected by rich people tell politicians who to appoint to lead agencies. These people give directives and can get agents fired for disobeying.
Stopping it means removing “single points of failures” like not having such a powerful hierarchy, in addition to accountability measures (independent inspections, etc)


Well, unless they also made key generation shitty, because that’s equally plausible and would likely allow RSA keys to be broken (it’s surprisingly hard to generate RSA keys safely)


Presidential pardons for state crimes don’t exist. Claiming he’s done it does nothing. Signing fancy formal papers saying so is null and void.


Unreliable certainly. For as long as there’s radio coverage there’s a way, but it used to be impractical to give passengers enough bandwidth. 20 years ago you’d have to ask the captain nicely to get a call routed (read: have an emergency)
If you allow civilian HAM radio, you go back a few more decades (not quite applicable to planes, but definitely applicable to boats). If you allow Morse code you go back yet a little further.
This one (bath thermometer) goes to 111°F
Irrational probabilities makes MWI impractical unless you interpret the branching much like a continous graph (as a visualization, see phase of matter graphs) with an ever increasing number of dimensions. And yes continous branching is weird
They’re just contributing to perfect information, or, uh…


And why would a bunch of never-left-their-staters even care in the first place? They clearly don’t want freedom of movement
This map won’t be centered on the equator


EU have a freedom of expression law and multiple countries also have constitutional freedom of speech, including right to film police
Germany is also rather unique in having laws with opaque interpretations
https://digit.site36.net/2023/01/31/police-violence-in-germany-misuse-of-wiretapping-paragraph/
He holds it weird too


In USA, after 3 years of no use and no intent by the owner to use you can challenge a trademark


They went for the protocol used by Bluesky. But apparently disabling federation.


What about surrealists
You’re forgetting the girl gets to also make a wish