• 1 Post
  • 231 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 30th, 2024

help-circle















  • Adding to this, as I have now skimmed over the original video in question by ANA[DIA]LOG: He already introduces the topic by clearly stating that he is strongly biased towards “cables make a difference”, I can only assume he lacks the necessary fundamentals about what a cable does. He describes his test track to have “a lot of frequencies”. We don’t know about the gear he used, and he chose a singular test which cant’ be replicated as it has too many muddying variables. The data he shared had to be sanitized by you, to even give any chance of an objective interpretation, which really is impossible in these circumstances. When his test shows some differences, rather than being surprised and questioning the sanity of his test-setup, he just accepts the result that satisfies his bias. This is not science, this is a grifter trying to sell snake oil to the gullible.





  • This is highly dystopian. The article makes a very important point: It does not matter that AI is just imitating humanity. Their output has real and possibly destructive consequences for us.

    I’m beginning to view the current internet as a whole to be lost. We’re already starting to put up walls so that these models can’t get in anymore, and precautions are only going to become more sophisticated as AI keeps finding and abusing holes. Let’s hope that this is the return of a small and personal internet.