Yes. But if they aired it, they aired it on purpose. Clips like that are rarely actually live. So they made a show of not continuing to give him airtime, but they gave him enough to get his message out - twice.
A misunderstanding on your part I thinks. I believe they are saying it was inappropriate to attempt to sanitize reality so they could release a โfeel good puff pieceโ.
The news reporter wanted a feel good puff piece regardless of how inappropriate it is. The interviewee wanted to report the actual news.
Was it live? Probably not. That means they left it in on purpose.
Did you watch the clip?
Yes. But if they aired it, they aired it on purpose. Clips like that are rarely actually live. So they made a show of not continuing to give him airtime, but they gave him enough to get his message out - twice.
Itโs says โLiveโ in the upper left hand corner.
They often lie about that. Itโs usually pseudo live, as in, recorded just a short while before.
The company that owns that NBC affiliate wanted a feel good puff piece. I doubt she had a say in the matter.
Yeah, sheโs just following orders.
We all know how good โjust following ordersโ and โjust doing my jobโ turns out.
But it wasnโt inappropriateโฆ
To the holding company it is.
๐ค๐ผ
A misunderstanding on your part I thinks. I believe they are saying it was inappropriate to attempt to sanitize reality so they could release a โfeel good puff pieceโ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nBx-37c3c8