

Good, maybe people will stop using it and switch to an open-weight Chinese model
Mastodon: @sudoer777@matapacos.dog


Good, maybe people will stop using it and switch to an open-weight Chinese model


Then censor their identities. The reality is they’re trying to push the narrative that they didn’t abuse children, and if they released it that narrative would be completely crushed which would be far more devastating for the government than what’s happening right now.


If its viewable then it will be a lot more difficult for idiots to argue that the Epstein files is a hoax


https://nitter.net/realUpScrolled/status/2022787667654537686#m
And then they immediately got a surge of new users, well played Google
As far as I’m aware they don’t have a great security track record: https://soatok.blog/2024/08/14/security-issues-in-matrixs-olm-library/


I’m okay with a few crawlers, but not what’s effectively a DDoS attack by AI companies who abuse my resources generating terabytes of traffic and crashing my server while costing me money. I use Anubis now, which sucks from an accessibility standpoint but I’m not dealing with their malicious traffic anymore.


Yes if it’s tunneled to your self-hosting setup. With CGNAT you have to use similar services if you want to self-host.


Stoat and Matrix do fine with that model.
Having checked a year ago and checking again now, their UX has barely improved and the GUI is still significantly worse than Discord. They need some sort of monetization strategy for funding and leadership that isn’t a shitshow so that they can make something that people will actually want to use.


Engaging algorithms is the reason people stay on proprietary services. Fediverse users love to shoot themselves in the foot talking about how algorithms and AI sucks then wonder why people don’t want to switch


Engaging algorithm, no paywall, funding or monetization strategy, viewpoint diversity, and a large amount of people already using it
https://reuse.software/faq/#uncopyrightable
The REUSE specification recommends claiming copyright even if it’s machine generated. Is this incorrect information?
EDIT: Also, how is copyrighting code from an AI different than copyrighting an output from a compiler?
Draconian punishments and inflicting suffering and death has no place in a functioning society.
Yes, that’s why Trump should get the death penalty
There’s a billion other reasons Trump deserves the death penalty including committing multiple genocides.


I’ve used Signal with Google Voice before installed on separate profiles


I use a Google Pixel 6 Pro with GrapheneOS, Google Voice for probable spam, YouTube, and Google Maps for search. Once the GrapheneOS phone comes out that will probably be my next phone (and fuck Google with their planned obsolescence, makes me not want to buy another Pixel). Google Voice I don’t care but I could switch to another paid JMP.chat number if I need to. YT is difficult to leave (both for content and algorithm) and the Google Maps alternatives suck for searching.


Use a flamethrower, that way you’ll never have to deal with YouTube’s anti-adblock stuff again
I like the bottom image


For coding $280/mo is peanuts compared to how much the Claude API costs
At least they use your data to make a model that’s open weight