I’m not even sure whether there’s a defense against this when trying to limit the user to a subset of JavaScript. It feels like you need to write a compiler or interpreter that doesn’t know anything outside of that subset otherwise you can break out of the language sandbox.

What are you talking about? Logseq uses markdown. The database is built from the markdown files. You can regenerate it at any time.

Might as well buy a laptop with Linux on it.

Not one line, I tell you. Not a single one.

Removed by mod

I’m not the one complaining, Mr “SKG is trash”. I have a preference, but have no need for changes nor am I saying something’s wrong.

deleted by creator

It unfortunately isn’t. It looks exactly as I would expect.

You prioritise it another way, which is fine. Just don’t make the assumption everybody thinks like you do.

It looks like you’re looking to customise order of search results. That’s a feature you can suggest. I find files first very useful as it what I search for more often than settings, so I would have a different customisation.

Which results “matter”? This isn’t a helpful post. You aren’t describing what existed before, what you expect, what qualifies as good, and what qualifies as bad. You just say “it’s bad”.

If I walked into you house and said “your fridge is worse”, I imagine you would be puzzled too.

Which language is it written in and with which framework?

But are they going to develop games on the embedded device?

Long startup times? Godot opens very quickly on my computer. Granted, my projects are small test projects with not much going on, but flutter and dart will probably start sputtering once their scenes get bigger.

They are also always at the mercy of Google who might drop flutter and dart at any time.

Why the hell is this even possible? Why should a web page have access to the extensions you run?

No. Libraries will always be useful. Not everyone has the credits to generate the tokens necessary to rewrite every lib in existence.

Why do you need to do research for GPL? It’s the OG opensource license AFAIK that forces users to also opensource their stuff. MIT let’s anybody close source your code and make money with it.

GPL isn’t perfect as it doesn’t solve the funding problem, but MIT is about the worst thing one can do for opensource: do the work for companies, for free, and be OK with never contributing back to the opensource ecosystem.

Would be amazing if they set a goal to get off of Microslop’s Github.

But why MIT? How come that became the default? Why not GPL? Is Microslop Github suggesting MIT by default?

I look forward to a response from the EU Commission - if they ever gave a response to the hundreds of comments left with their feedback form. If they just ignore them, it’ll be a sad day for Europe.

Or maybe not so curious…

I don’t understand what’s going on with the rust community insisting on cuck licences. Do they love writing on their Mac books so much?