• 0 Posts
  • 138 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 15th, 2025

help-circle



  • I think it’s more complicated than that… Anonymous as a kind of social movement exited long before QAnon. It was already on 4chan and Something Awful which came before 4chan. Anonymous had ops to go after predators and all kinds of other targets. Lots of the grassroots support merged from the Something Awful forums to 4chan, then all the copycats of 4chan. QAnon was originally a continuation of an anonymous operation to go after abusers. As time went by, this morphed into what was sort of co-opted by Michael Flynn, Epstein, and others to use for political reasons. At first though it really wasn’t political. Then the Q persona itself came along and was likely several different people instead of just one person. This follows the whole Anonyous OP getting co-opted. The Epstein Cabal really was going after social media along with other kinds of tech. Ghislaine Maxwell was a Reddit mod. Eventually you get to Ron Watkins, etc… TLDR; QAnon started as an Anonymous operation and then was co-opted for political reasons.





  • Epstein and his enablers believed in jewish supremacy. One of his victims went into a lot of detail about that groups views on how their DNA makes them superior to everyone else. I’m sure it also has religious beliefs tied into it as well. That’s also why he was never held accountable by others who followed the same supremacist logic. This same way of thinking about other people extends to white supremacy and even class supremacy. That’s why he was never really held accountable by anyone… They all believed the victims were subhuman, compared to their supremacy views. And therefore it wasn’t “abuse”. This gets even weirder once you consider Epsteins views on demographics.







  • GOP maps were gerrymandered with the expectation that a certain amount of minority groups would still support the GOP and would factor into the way the districts are divided. All of that has changed now, meaning the assumptions made using past statistical data from elections and demographics are invalid. Much of it has to do with the views of immigration enforcement for the ones not deported. This also factors into DNC gerrymandering in other ways. Remains to be seen what impact the actual deportations have on voting. As long as no one being here illegally was voting, there is no net political loss for Democrats. It’s not like they are losing voters. So the midterms will be very interesting. It’s no surprise they want to take what’s going on in Fulton County, Georgia and try to apply an illegal immigrant angle to it, then have Bannon say ICE needs to run intimidation campaigns at the polling stations. The effect of this again goes back to the same root issues. There is a long history in the U.S. of voting site intimidation. Much of it having to do with people exercising their rights to vote during the Civil Rights Era in the South.