

I would argue that this would be the minority of users, not the majority.


I would argue that this would be the minority of users, not the majority.


- it means a minority can pass a rule without it being even seen by the majority
Why do you think that?


What is it about then?


It’s authoritarian to do direct democracy? OK then, I guess words mean nothing anymore.


Not gonna lie, that was a hilarious pwn @Xylight@lemdro.id


Yes. I also agree the way you say it can betray the implication. If someone suggest a feature and your only reply is “PRs welcome ;)” it points to it being dismissive. However, after being in the “game” for a while so to speak, I can also understand dismissiveness as well since there’s plenty of people who do drive-by suggestions and get upset when the developer doesn’t immediately jump to implement them.


An aside: this “feel free to open a PR” - without any justification or discussion about the merit of issue at hand - is the standard passive-aggressive response from every developer who is not interested in making the change. It’s sad to see that it’s also becoming the go-to retort for the project cheerleaders…
That’s absolutely not true. I can’t speak for all developers of course, but as someone who is juggling multiple large FOSS project, when I give that reply, 99% of the time I would like that feature, but I don’t have the resources to do it myself.


Not trying to dissuade you or anything, but out curiousity, how do you imagine WP’s pivot to GenAI will affect your installation? Or is it just a case of not wanting to support their developers?
I think switching to the same URLs and a familiar backend is going to be really hard. Since you’re not coders, It might perhaps be simpler to make a clean cut and switch to a new CMS and archive/freeze the old site.


I agree that banning for posts 7 months apart is not ideal. I’ll ask them to take it a bit less strict.


These communities routinely get people serially downvoting them and since lemmy doesn’t present a way to avoid that, they resort to banning people who are seen as only downvoting. They don’t ban on a single downvote either.
I can see your downvotes on my end. I don’t know if your software federation broke or what else happened.


You’ve been caught downvoting at least 4 posts
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46465818 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/61834209 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/61834207 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46403765
The mods of those comms do not ban from one vote.


Haha no, it’s ours and anarchist.nexus, but we may add more soon


Lol, nah. It’s our confederation of anarchist instances


. I’ve seen this in the mod logs where someone has a relatively innocuous comment removed just because the mod disagrees with them, then they are suddenly banned from both that community and 10 or 12 other communities. All run by the same moderator.


Some instances will flip them the bird, like I imagine db0 won’t stand for that shit.
Oh I hope someone tries to pull this shit in the flotilla…👹


Great article. Thanks


But where are those models. The author tried to found open torrents but couldn’t.
No