

This is like some always sunny shit.
“it’s not like the SS is coming”
Cue the always sunny title music and the text “the SS ruins the Olympics”


This is like some always sunny shit.
“it’s not like the SS is coming”
Cue the always sunny title music and the text “the SS ruins the Olympics”
How are you going to build that application you wrote on the paper?


The problem with your argument is that while you can buy the lower res movie because you don’t need more and if a lower res doesn’t exist you can still watch the high res on your low res TV, you can’t choose to buy a lower install size game or software.
When you buy those, the size it is is usually what you will have to install to use it, and if you can’t buy a large enough storage to install it…


I get that, I was just having fun with your typo 🙂


Patent gamer?
You only play original ideas?


That doesn’t mean that your carrier isn’t the problem.
Just like the person you replied to, I to can just log in to my carriers app on a new phone and get eSIM fixed there if my old phone is in an unusable state.


Yeah, this has become an issue for us at work as well.
Currently we are doing a POC for an in-house developed solution where a azure function app handles the renewal of certificates for any domain we have, both wildcard and named, and place the certificates in a key vault where services that need them can get access.
Looks to be working, so the main issue now is finding a non-US certificate provider that supports acme. EU has some but even more local there aren’t many options.


The main issue, and this is also mentioned in the blog post, is that the bot only does translation and not localisation.
The first is just taking the words from one language and changing to another.
The second is to actually make sure the text in the new language makes proper sense. Maybe the English article uses some analogy that does realy make sense in the new language. Localisation is to find some other suitable analogy to use instead, so that the point from the main article is kept, but it still makes sense.


The main issue there is that project zero, where if you ignore what Google has reported, they will just go ahead and disclose the issue.
Doesn’t look like you have set any limitations on uploading to it?
I’ll just go ahead and upload my 20TB or so of linux ISOs to your public facing website where everyone can see what is uploaded to it…


Or they are just home users behind a CGNAT, which more and more ISPs use.
And even if they aren’t, home users usually have dynamic IPs, meaning it can change.
That won’t stop me! I vibe code!


You block then investigate yes.
Just like every other company in existence does it, since the first thing you want to do is stop continued spread/misuse.


Here is the post from Billet Labs themselves where they verify that they only asked for the cooler back after the video had been released: https://www.reddit.com/r/LinusTechTips/comments/18d6m3u/deleted_by_user/kcfmcnz/
Now, i’m not saying that LTT didn’t do Billet Lbs dirty in regards to this whole situation.
They did not test the cooler correctly, and Linus was less than resonable in regards to retesting and such (something he has adressed himself here: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/#comment-16078641 ).
But people keep hanging up that they sold when they were supposed to send it back, when there was no such agreement beforehand.


About Honey, they didn’t find out that Honey was scamming viewers until everyone else did.
What they found out earlier, at the same time as many other youtubers, was that Honey was “scamming” the youtubers themselves by replacing the youtubers reference codes.
At the time they thought the viewers still got discounts, so they didn’t announce anything about it since it would seem like they asked the viewers not to take the discounts so that LTT could make more money.


About the Billet Labs thing, they have shown, and Billet Labs verified it, that the original agreement was that LTT would keep the cooler.
It was only after the bad review they asked for it back, and at that point there was miss communication between the person Billet Labs talked to and the logistics department at LTT, so the cooler wasn’t set aside as it should.


What does US law matter to France in this case?


Unless you are running on Pata drives from the 90s or have movies in fucking 32k, there is no reason for movies on the hard drives to buffer.
Probably something going on with your server causing it. The HDDs connected to a bad card, or something keeping the drives very busy


Definitely, as after this it was announced that Apple would not be affected by the 100% semiconductor tariffs.
Just look at his wiki, that has details about some pr shit he did with the IDF