What are the critical features of Discord?

• group chat with history and some degree of searchability
• forums (but with more realtime features so it works a bit closer to a chat)
• voice calling, including groups
• video calling
• screen sharing
• mobile app with much the same features as desktop
• web app, ditto.
• “ownership” of specific spaces (“servers” in discord context)
• solid permission setup for visibility (like “roles” in discord)
• trivial startup effort

Other less-critical but still potentially important features:

• markdown-like formatting in posts/messages
• grouping of channels
• intermix of “forum” spaces with “groupchat” and “voice/video” spaces

I don’t know of any that cover all of those, and ymmv on how critical some of these are.

Winget , chocolatey, scoop… Windows is feeling almost like a real OS now!

Oh yeah for sure. If only we had “bag detection” I would agree.

I’d argue that an overheating when the lid is closed not in a bag is a major design flaw.

I’ve never seen it but I mostly see business laptops not gaming or consumer laptops so shitty designs are out there I’m sure.

If a laptop lid is closed, it needs to be sleeping, period.

See, and here I feel the exact opposite. If it’s docked I don’t want it going to sleep just because I closed the lid. I still want to be able to use the two screens that are attached and in use!

I mean that document lists “tenne” as the color, which doesn’t seem right to me at all.

I thought it was “taupe” for some reason but I can’t find where that would be suggested.

He needs to go there personally to break ground though.

Not entirely true: some people will change with smaller warnings, even just this news. Others require graphic warnings plastered on the front to change. More warnings, more impact.

Well, yeah. That’s what the spectrum is.

Low end: “you can see the source but can’t do anything with it” (questionable whether this counts as open source at all)

High end “do what you want, it’s literally yours” (public domain).

One can debate where the low boundary of “open source” is, or what makes one license more or less free than another, but the spectrum is the range of limitations.

It is a spectrum (MIT vs GPL vs APL for example) but this is outside that spectrum.

Don’t have to worry about that, win11 isn’t reliable enough for that.

We had a similar situation for a voicemail system though.

Better to link to the main page rather than the download page that immediately tries to download the app.

https://www.sordum.org/9312/edge-blocker-v2-0/

Sadly I doubt my employer would take kindly to me using this tool.

Absolutely.

Just need a way to admin Active Directory from Linux and I’m set…

4. Repeat step two forever when Microsoft decides there was a problem that can be solved by resetting your default browser.

the classic Disney hero Zorro

“Disney hero”?? Zorro dates to 1919, although Disney did make a movie TV show about 40 years later…

I see recommendations for the Hario Mini Mill and a comment that it is slow. I haven’t used that specific one but I use the Skerton Pro because it’s got a higher capacity and is compatible with standard jars if I break the factory jar.

The mechanism looks to be identical, so I can’t imagine your 20 g requirement would be a problem in terms of time; I’m usually grinding 50 g in 2-3 min.

Haha… I don’t have stablediffusion because !fuck_ai@lemmy.world but I didn’t realize they were that close to procedural generation techniques.

The problem with “effort” as a metric is that there’s high effort shit as well as low-effort good stuff. But I suppose usually the high-effort shit at least has a good story behind it.

Also, I think that LLM based generation is a subcategory of proc gen.

Hmm… I would usually think of proc gen as being more deterministic than what LLMs do (even if they use random numbers there’s usually a seed value to get consistent random numbers)

I guess in some ways the important part is how much work the purported artist put in to the output.

I think you’re conflating “AI” (LLM) with procedural generation. The former should be banned, the latter allowed.

Yeah… the difference is that one (sparrows) was just a bad idea due to a total misunderstanding of the problem. The sparrows weren’t the pests, the bugs they eat were.

The other (one child) is a good idea that was poorly managed due to unexpected cultural mores. Even so it would still be effective once people are “incentivized” to give up on the foolishness of prioritizing one sex over the other.

The one child policy really gonna be up there with killing all the sparrows long term…

Except that killing the sparrows was a bad idea.