Hi guy
Peter thiel is everything wrong with the world.
He is a plague, a cancer, a curse.
He is in the Epstein files.
He likely had his gay lover killed for revealing he was gay.
Peter thiel is the enemy of humanity.
Peter thiel is an antichrist
I agree that it should be able to infer the intent, but I stand by that it remain somewhat unclear and open to interpretation. Eg, If such language was used in a legal contract, it would not be enough to simply say, well, they should understand what I meant.
The people doing this test, I’m sure, are not linguistic masters, nor legal scholars.
There are lines of work where clarity is essential.
And what if my question actually was asking, should I just go for a walk instead of driving that far?
I know the answer. But as 30% demonstrated, clarity IS needed.
Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question:
There are 3 sentences.
I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’
A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?
Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.
Do you see how this works?
Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.
Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question are not related to autism. (In my case)
I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’
A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?
Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.
Do you see how this works?
Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.
Without reading the article, the title just says wash the car.
I could go for a walk and wash my car in my driveway.
Reading the article… That is exactly the question asked. It is a very ambiguous question.
*I do understand the intent of the question, but it could be phrased more clearly.
That’s how they are gonna take over Greenland;
give them free medical supplies* shipping,handling,dispensing,and all the other insane fees not included
bill them
Now American bank owns Greenland!
Maybe it was because he was recording them with the creepy sex offender glasses that are only used by repervicans.
You know, it wasn’t always like this
Not very long ago, just before your time
Right before the towers fell, circa '99
This was catalogs, travel blogs, a chatroom or two
We set our sights and spent our nights waiting
For you, you, insatiable you
Mommy let you use her iPad, you were barely two
And it did all the things we designed it to do
Now, look at you, oh, ha, look at you
You, you, unstoppable, watchable
Your time is now, your inside’s out, honey, how you grew
And if we stick together, who knows what we’ll do?
It was always the plan
to put the world in your hand
~ Bo Burnham
Hardware will be available, silly. †
You will have the “freedom” ‡ to choose from the hardware vendor* you want. Like always! ‡‡
† For $49.95 per month.
^Terms and conditions and government social score apply.^
‡‡ ^Authorized and approved by the department of national security and intelligence gathering agencies and the billionaire technofascist bros clubh^
What if the ‘aliens’ are us. Or the AI that killed us.
From the future.
Or, decendents of eons old terrestrial civilizations that were highly advanced and were either wiped from the *surface* of the earth due to some geological cataclysm.
Or, they have always lived in the oceans and we are one of their many genetic experiments - or maybe the harvest.
If we hung up musk by his plastic surgery disaster-penis, took what his assets were worth (he’s worth nothing as a human), we could have more than a million millionaires, though…
Repos can get / have been hacked/malicious code injected.
I wonder if putting up that sign (not everyone is welcome) with a few people in flowing white robes would be considered 👌Okkk
I swear the friendly future I had hoped of as a kid in the 80s/90s was either all propaganda, hijacked, or we actually did end up in an alternate timeline of pure fuckery.
This is not the future I evangelized.
And yeah, those of us who grew up through it have seen the horrific turn of things have taken from potential world changing awesome humanity, to absolute evil.
I think the happy comes with the unsaid “or else”
You be happy or you be soylent.
In 2030 you will own nothing.
And you will be happy.
For future reference and for the sake of your privacy, the link to the item is simply this:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/133582253643?_skw=full+face+sunglasses
The rest is tracking data.
It also happened after the war.
The us gov secretly brought over a couple thousand.
Many were known SS/Nazi.
This had become my favorite end of the world song and I hate that I have a favorite end of the world song that is so on the nose.
20,0004 years of this.
7 3 More to go.
I prefer letting my kids get hit by cars traveling at 100mph instead of having cars with brakes and speed limits.