• 3 Posts
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 14th, 2025

help-circle

  • This does not refute your bonus point, because this is going to depend on who you are. Everyone is different, so ymmv, but as a systems thinker with VERY pronounced ADHD, counting (while it works on paper) has never actually worked for me past the first few weeks.

    In my experience, though, when I am exercising, yes I may eat a bit more to replace what was spent, but I’m put in touch with my body a LOT more, and get clearer signals for what to eat. This often ends up becoming a kind of feedback loop, because I’ll start craving healthier foods that contain more micros, and are less calorically dense whole foods - mostly plants. I’m no longer eating just to get through, but responding to my body intuitively, which significantly reduces the cognitive load of “gotta eat healthy foods”. This is self-reinforcing too. As new microorganisms from specific foods colonize the gut, it pushes the brain to want more of those foods. (Sounds crazy, but it’s true.)

    For example, maybe I’ll want a chopped up head of iceberg lettuce with shredded beets/carrots, SMALL portion of chicken/salmon/tofu and a piece of fruit instead of just that dense protein bar or bag of chips to keep me going. Good luck gaining weight on the first one - you would literally not have enough time in the day to prepare, eat and digest an amount that would add any weight.

    Exercise doesn’t have to be crazy strenuous either. Just moving at all helps, and low impact movement can help tremendously with the aches and pains that can come with extra weight. OP is very young, and might not be feeling it yet, but she will.

    Walking, swimming, cycling, and yoga are all fantastic places to start out, and those activities do have varying levels of accessibility but they’re still all very achievable for the vast majority of people.

    CICO is fundamental science at the level of basic physics, but there’s also human psychology and the brain-gut connection to contend with. Layering other things on top of CICO, to that end, could result in compounding effects which accelerate and complement a foundation of rote calorie counting. A whole-system approach that integrates movement, nutrition and food prep skills together with intuitive eating is very much worth trying and is more likely to last long term IMO. With enough practice, this became a new normal. I feel great, keep a healthy stable weight and don’t even think about calories anymore tbh.










  • You’re clearly not who I’m talking about then.

    I’ve used various distros as daily drivers for over 20 years. Debian-based is comfy for me. So is the terminal, but I’ll use a gui if it suits the situation. If I need a software package I install it in whatever way works, whether that’s building from source and fighting through dependencies, composing a docker image, unpacking a static .deb or clicking ‘install’ on flat hub. I’m aware of the differences, and issues folks have, and I have my own preferences as well, but I mostly just don’t care. It’s all free (gratis) software, which I’m glad even exists. If it’s truly libre, even better, I’m all about that. Given 2 functionally equivalent packages I’ll always pick the most libre one. At the end of the day, I don’t feel the need to run an ideologically pristine system. I need it to work.

    I clearly touched a nerve, lol, but there’s no need to get defensive.





  • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldAnother W
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No, no, no - this is all wrong. I don’t consider you a person unless you self-flagellate at the terminal daily, compiling from source in dependency hell while being cleansed by the vim fires at the altar of Tux.

    This species of Linux user reminds me quite a lot of Catholics.





  • With a FOSS OS, the local systems administrator would be considered the OS provider

    Would they though? I only skimmed the bill text, but I think it might be hard to determine who is the “OS provider”, who is the “store” and who the “developers” are in the case of FOSS.

    It doesn’t require a numerical age but rather an “age bracket” that the user provides during setup (<13, 13-16, 16-18, 18+) which must be “made available” to the “store” and the store must have a mechanism for picking up that “age signal” (lol).

    Maybe I’m misunderstanding, (and ianal) but the language seems incredibly loose. I would not be surprised if this thing gets poked full of holes and worked around (if it doesn’t end up being tied up in court first.)

    It would be hilarious if distros could just provide age bracketed ISO downloads for the under 18 brackets and say that the download of an ISO is part of the setup.