Don’t forget Epic Sax Man

I can see why it’s a spicy headline but we should appreciate a human override capability.

Hopefully waymo is forced into transparency about this. Transparency 100% fully clear on when the tech runs into a variety of situations including humans intervening.

That should be a mandatory for them to have the licensing necessary to operate autonomous vehicles anywhere in public spaces.

After all, they are learning on the public’s dime and at the public’s risk. We have to know if it’s truly better and what kind of new risks are created that weren’t otherwise anticipated.

Didn’t think about the possibility of a kinetic energy unit, thanks for the insight

The wind at 32,000 ft is 200 times stronger than the wind at the surface?

Ummm… 10 knots * 200 = 2000 knots. I don’t think so lol.

A lot of strange numbers in this article that bring its accuracy into question.

No mention of the weight of a 1 and 1/2 km wire that is also suitable to anchor this thing in place. Or are they going to float batteries and bring them down to discharge?

Lol. At this stage what can you do? Roll your eyes. Hope for a freak lightning strike.

Hard to tell if you’re trolling or trying to add value to the conversation and just missing it.

A hammer doesn’t know what it is building but it is still useful.

This is the nature of tools: for some they improve output, for some they don’t.

I’m lazy as fuck. I want to solve problems in the easiest way humanly possible. With the least amount of effort output.

What about you? Do you take the hard way?

People around me use AI all the time to get answers to generalized topics. More and more they use it like a search engine / information augmentation system.

They are not technical people. They mostly know that the information needs to be double checked and might be wrong. But usually take it at face value if the importance is low.

Honestly this is about what they did before. They would search Google, click on the first blog, skim it, and repeat until getting some answer they believe.

I too use AI regularly for brainstorming, quickly summarizing massive text messages, and reformatting text from a jumbled mess into something more cohesive, etc.

I don’t love it or hate it. In some cases it saves a lot of time and is useful tool. In other cases it outputs trash that we cannot use for any serious case.

Just like a hammer or a shovel, it’s a tool. Can be used the right way and it can be used the wrong way.

This plus all the other recent cases of people stepping down or being charged actually should scare the shit out of Trump.

I mean he’s probably still safe at the moment, and might literally die of old age before consequences, but he’s only in the clear until the millisecond his “friends” smell blood in the water. Which is evidently starting.

Politically you are probably right. New York Times? A business that likely wishes to sell more subscriptions.

On the left: shit happens

On the right: humans are doing stupid shit

I think the OP is trying to express that the New York times is distorting the news. Perhaps true, but humans doing stupid shit will always sell a newspaper.

Uh oh… I bet the sound isn’t directional enough to work like this too. Yet.

Been like this forever… Version 1.0 always sucks. Even worse is when a company ships a 0.4.2.1 beta and still calls it 1.0.

Testing costs a lot and hey, why not let your early adopters pay the price in return for having something nobody else has yet.

A project that’s never released or monetized is a hobby. We all need hobbies. And it seems like this one was extraordinarily developmental because it taught you a lot about what goes into a game. It also taught you about videos, building in public, and setting expectations.

I hope you don’t see it as a negative and instead ask something like going to University on steroids. If you decide to develop a game to completion in the future, you’re going to be that much further down the road

Yeah, good. Don’t build roads, bridges, and trains. Let’s build jails.

/s

I think the problem they cannot solve yet is a) knowing what to do and b) knowing when it’s properly done.

The result is possibly more output per qualified human, but with your competition having the same tool, you’re just keeping pace, not advancing.

We have to either take it from them, or figure out how to get as much freedom from the rat race as possible by other means. The taking it from them part is difficult because the people with the money also have most of the guns and, by extension, laws.

“Normal” Americans can do this too if they have enough capital. The amount needed may be less than you think.

These outcomes are features of modern finance and there aren’t a lot of secrets about how it works. A lot of people could benefit by learning and using the same rules for their own benefit. These so called rich people know it because they talk about it with each other. Normies can look to forums like coastfire, expatfire, leanfire and similar for tips about how to similarly exploit the finance regulation in place today.

If you get a W2, and you spend most or all of the salary for living expenses - with no gap for significant savings, you’re trading a month of labor for a month of living expenses. It might feel ok because you sit on a leather seat or stay in the Hilton sometimes. But if there is nothing left over you’re perpetually running on fumes.

The only way out of this is by cutting expenses and creating as wide a gap as possible and pouring it into assets that grow, not shrink, in value. With the power of compounding returns nobody is more than a decade, decade and a half or so away from freedom. But yeah, you do have to live like a miser during that time.

I’m having an issue like this as well. Blocked keywords, blocked communities are showing often in my main feed suddenly

Lying to the court is at minimum perjury, no? I wonder if the culture at these Immigration offices is such that they are encouraging this behavior or if it’s looked down on?

If you’re an attorney at a prestigious law firm and you’re held in contempt or caught lying, I think this would be career limiting, potentially result in the loss of your license, and look bad on your firm.

Lawyers might have shitty clients though, and that might be the case at these DHS offices. I’m thinking about that one attorney who asked the judge to hold her in contempt. If that’s the case you’d hope the attorney won’t act until they are confident in the facts.