I thought they said controversial?

He got immediately dumped into the ocean IIRC

It’s neck is tied into a fucking knot 😂

That said though, this birb slaps. Really high power and good typing for the early game

I mean, just the fact that we increased the ppm by ~100, or 1/3rd what it was, in just 60 years is terrifying. Let alone that it’s accelerating. And CO2 isn’t even the worst climate change gas. And there are many positive feedback loops getting exacerbated by the effects…

Good times

The sub of a domreddit obviously

There’s literally no way to know. Anything that you could normally write off as an insane thing that no politician, let alone world leader, would say, this man will, and probably had said

To be fair, in the era of “first kiss” it’s important to remember that we are all awkward as fuck.

Lmao. That italic/asterisk text would be amazing to see IRL. Although I feel like it would be rarer for a corporation to not have that.

I can’t tell if that’s the legit size of the hat, or, while still comically large… It’s been “enhanced” for extra humour (like kirks small face edits).

Like the internal rim that should sit on her head looks too wide to r free sitting on her head the way it is

More special than ones we’ve detected, but our detection methods have a very biased available dataset.

I know the title explicitly says gay men, but then talks about Gay women and straight men as if the two sexualities are all that exist.

I’m sure the number, if you include bi, bi curious, pan etc. Is much higher than 5%.

I’m a mostly straight man (let’s say 2/3rds) and I’ve given more blowies than an ex female I was with for over a decade.

Yes

Dang, I only got like 6 or 7 of these, even though I know all the bands.

Was thinking that they could have easily done counting crows too

So if new games start using ai, which is generated from pirating content, it is ethical to pirate those games

That’s what happens when you give the richest people tax breaks and subsidise all your rich buddies endevours without uplifting the lowest socio-economic portions if society.

The best way to fix the economy is always to give the poorest more money (or less financial burden) because they spend a much higher percentage (usually all) of their excess income to keep afloat or improve their way of life.

The worst way is to give rich people more money. Because they horde it, gamble on non tangible goods (stocks, crypto, “ai” etc), send it off shore, keep it in the family and share it with other rich people etc.

It’s ironic that the party that always does the worse thing for the economy and demonises doing the best is seen by the masses as the “good for the economy” party.

I mean, not a single other current movie/show on their front page has 99% audience score.

Even if Melanoma was secretly good and “the critics were trying to bury it” they would be suspicious.

It’ll be a shit load of bots, and then the same reactionary people that make everything politically partisan and mass review bomb anything “woke”

People that didn’t see it and don’t care about “how well it does” won’t review it at all, so there’s no counter votes because… Literally no one seeing it.

Damn, those people under the boat must have had mad lungs

I’m shocked how far I had to scroll to find Wayne’s world…and having an existential crisis at his quickly time moves 😅

It blows my mind that you can just stumble across that stuff on a popular public forum

This also explains why any “woke” movie or TV series gets immediately review bombed