DeFiStar.io

Real-time Stablecoin Analytics

  Market Utilisation Intelligence

DeFi Pool Utilisation Dashboard

Live utilisation rates for 53+ lending pools across Aave, Compound, Morpho, Spark, and more. Spot liquidity risk, find optimal-zone opportunities, and understand how utilisation drives your supply yield — updated every 30 minutes.

Data snapshot: 15 Mar 2026, 05:15 UTC
Market Average
57.6%
Across 53 pools tracked
Critical ≥90%
1
1.9% of market — withdrawal risk
Elevated 80–90%
4
Approaching kink — rates rising
Optimal 45–80%
35
Sweet spot — yield & liquidity balanced
Low / Cold <45%
13
Excess supply — suppressed yields
Utilisation Distribution

How many pools sit in each 10% band — the shape of DeFi's borrow demand curve right now.

Protocol Average Utilisation

Protocols above 80% carry elevated liquidity pressure market-wide. Morpho is excluded — its peer-to-peer model makes high utilisation structurally expected, not a risk signal.

Utilisation by Chain

Chain-level averages reflect local borrowing demand. High chain averages may indicate systemic liquidity pressure on that network.

Interest Rate Model (IRM)

Above the kink (~80%), borrow rates spike to protect pool liquidity. Market average of 57.6% marked by white dot.

0–44% Cold/LowBelow target; suppressed yields.
45–80% Optimal ✓Target zone; yield & liquidity.
80–90% ElevatedApproaching kink; rates rising.
90–100% CriticalRates spike; withdrawal risk.
All Pools — Live Utilisation
53 pools · sorted by utilisation ↓
Filter:
Asset Protocol Chain Utilisation Zone Supply APY TVL Safety Links
FDUSD Aave V3 BNB Chain
91.0%
Critical 5.92% $1.08M 23
USDC Spark Ethereum
89.7%
Elevated 4.14% $17.70M 45
GHO Aave V3 Avalanche
84.2%
Elevated 3.91% $2.14M 24
USDT Compound V3 Polygon
82.0%
Elevated 3.28% $1.66M 24
USDC Compound V3 Polygon
80.4%
Elevated 3.22% $2.41M 26
USDC Compound V3 Base
79.6%
Optimal 3.18% $10.83M 53
USDC Aave V3 Polygon
79.4%
Optimal 2.80% $4.51M 42
USDC Euler V2 Ethereum
79.0%
Optimal 4.04% $2.35M 45
USDC Compound V3 Optimism
77.0%
Optimal 3.08% $3.25M 39
crvUSD Aave V3 Ethereum
76.1%
Optimal 3.18% $228.5K 28
USDT Compound V3 Optimism
75.3%
Optimal 3.01% $3.98M 34
USDC Aave V3 Base
74.1%
Optimal 2.47% $399.09M 66
USDC Aave V3 Avalanche
71.2%
Optimal 2.03% $100.96M 63
USDC Venus BNB Chain
71.0%
Optimal 3.98% $73.06M 45
DAI Spark Ethereum
69.6%
Optimal 2.68% $272.30M 58
DAI Aave V3 Optimism
68.7%
Optimal 1.96% $928.2K 30
USDC Aave V3 Ethereum
68.3%
Optimal 1.82% $3.64B 87
USDS Spark Ethereum
67.8%
Optimal 2.55% $95.39M 46
USDT Euler V2 Ethereum
66.9%
Optimal 2.88% $984.0K 31
USDT Aave V3 Ethereum
65.7%
Optimal 1.69% $5.36B 82
USDT Aave V3 Optimism
65.0%
Optimal 1.69% $5.91M 50
USDC Aave V3 BNB Chain
64.9%
Optimal 1.69% $18.46M 65
USDC Compound V3 Ethereum
64.8%
Optimal 2.59% $413.37M 74
DAI Aave V3 Arbitrum
64.1%
Optimal 1.71% $4.96M 41
USDC Aave V3 Optimism
63.7%
Optimal 1.62% $17.62M 67
USDT Aave V3 BNB Chain
62.6%
Optimal 1.57% $75.67M 60
DAI Aave V3 Polygon
62.5%
Optimal 2.93% $4.73M 40
USDC Aave V3 Arbitrum
60.2%
Optimal 1.45% $272.52M 77
USDT Compound V3 Ethereum
59.8%
Optimal 2.39% $202.12M 69
USDT Compound V3 Arbitrum
58.9%
Optimal 2.36% $22.95M 49
USDT Venus BNB Chain
58.7%
Optimal 2.82% $227.94M 52
FRAX Aave V3 Ethereum
57.1%
Optimal 1.59% $145.6K 30
DAI Aave V3 Ethereum
57.0%
Optimal 1.32% $182.45M 73
USDT Spark Ethereum
55.5%
Optimal 1.58% $293.70M 67
EURC Aave V3 Ethereum
55.4%
Optimal 1.69% $68.96M 62
PYUSD Aave V3 Ethereum
52.5%
Optimal 1.57% $407.31M 72
GHO Aave V3 Arbitrum
50.9%
Optimal 1.42% $2.67M 37
USDe Aave V3 Ethereum
50.9%
Optimal 0.86% $1.07B 71
LUSD Aave V3 Arbitrum
46.5%
Optimal 1.34% $201.8K 27
USDC Compound V3 Arbitrum
45.4%
Optimal 1.82% $563.4K 31
GHO Aave V3 Gnosis
43.3%
Low 1.01% $785.3K 27
USDtb Aave V3 Ethereum
41.6%
Low 0.69% $216.62M 70
USDC Aave V3 Scroll
40.0%
Low 0.36% $1.31M 40
GHO Aave V3 Base
39.2%
Low 1.55% $6.93M 27
EURC Aave V3 Avalanche
39.1%
Low 0.84% $1.09M 26
FRAX Aave V3 Arbitrum
38.1%
Low 0.71% $177.8K 14
USDbC Aave V3 Base
35.5%
Low 0.70% $512.8K 15
EURC Aave V3 Base
33.7%
Low 0.85% $15.10M 41
RLUSD Aave V3 Ethereum
31.0%
Low 0.86% $545.14M 59
LUSD Aave V3 Ethereum
27.8%
Low 0.39% $2.77M 36
PYUSD Spark Ethereum
22.3%
Low 0.83% $100.00M 45
USDC Aave V3 Gnosis
10.0%
Cold 0.02% $158.2K 22
USDS Aave V3 Ethereum
2.5%
Cold 0.10% $44.79M 27

Understanding Pool Utilisation

What Utilisation Tells You as a Lender

Utilisation is the single most actionable real-time signal in a lending pool. It tells you how much capital is actively borrowed and — critically — how much remains available for withdrawal. A pool at 95% utilisation has only 5% of total deposits that can be withdrawn immediately. Everything else is locked in active loans.

The market average right now is 57.6% across 53 tracked pools. 1 pools are operating at critical capacity (≥90%) — meaning those pools carry real withdrawal risk for large positions. Always size your deposit against the free float, not the total TVL.

The Interest Rate Model — How It Uses Utilisation

Every major lending protocol implements a kink-based interest rate model. From 0% up to the optimal point (typically 80%), borrow rates climb gradually. Cross the kink and rates jump sharply — often doubling or tripling within a few percentage points. This is deliberate architecture: the spike punishes excess borrowing, incentivises repayments, and pulls utilisation back toward the target band.

As a lender, you benefit from elevated yields during high-utilisation periods. But above 90%, you're also exposed to the liquidity crunch — your capital may be temporarily illiquid if it exceeds the pool's free float.

How to Use This Dashboard Effectively

Chasing yield? Sort by Supply APY, then verify utilisation is below 90%. The optimal zone (45–80%) consistently offers the best risk-adjusted yield — high enough demand to push rates up, but enough free float to exit cleanly.

Monitoring risk? Filter by "Critical ≥90%" to immediately see which pools are near capacity. These pools pay the highest rates but carry the highest withdrawal risk — suitable only for positions smaller than the free float (TVL × (100% − utilisation %)).

Researching a protocol? Check the Protocol Average chart above. A protocol with consistently high average utilisation across all its pools signals strong borrowing demand platform-wide — generally a healthy sign, unless multiple individual pools are simultaneously in the critical zone. Note that Morpho is excluded from this dashboard — see below for why.

Why Morpho Is Excluded from This Dashboard

Morpho and Morpho Blue are deliberately not shown here. Unlike Aave, Compound, or Spark — which operate shared liquidity pools — Morpho uses a peer-to-peer matching engine that directly pairs individual lenders with individual borrowers. This architectural difference means utilisation near or at 100% is structurally expected and by design on Morpho, not a risk signal.

Displaying Morpho pools alongside conventional lending protocols would be actively misleading: a 98% utilisation figure that indicates a serious liquidity squeeze on Aave simply means "fully matched" on Morpho, with no withdrawal queue or rate spike implied. To keep this dashboard accurate and actionable, Morpho pools are excluded entirely. You can explore Morpho yields on the Yield Finder.

Frequently Asked Questions

Pool utilisation is the percentage of deposited assets that are currently borrowed. If a pool holds £10M in deposits and £7.5M is lent out, utilisation is 75%. This single number determines both what borrowers pay and what lenders earn — it is the primary input to every major protocol's interest rate model. Protocols are designed to gravitate toward a target band (typically 45–80%) by raising borrow rates as utilisation climbs.

Above 90%, two things happen simultaneously. Borrow rates spike dramatically at the kink — this is intentional protocol design to deter new borrowing and incentivise repayment. Simultaneously, the free float available for withdrawals shrinks below 10% of total deposits. A lender with a large position may find their capital temporarily illiquid — they continue earning yield, but cannot exit until new deposits arrive or loans are repaid. This is why we flag pools above 90% as "Critical" and why Morpho is excluded from this dashboard — Morpho's peer-to-peer model makes 100% utilisation structurally normal and not a risk signal, so comparing it here would be misleading.

Largely yes, but with nuance. Supply APY is calculated approximately as: Supply APY ≈ Borrow Rate × Utilisation × (1 − Protocol Reserve Factor). As utilisation climbs, both the borrow rate and the utilisation multiplier increase — so supply yield rises steeply. The peak effective supply yield typically occurs between 85–95% utilisation, not at 100%. At full utilisation, there are no idle deposits — but the pool would be completely illiquid, which the rate model is designed to prevent.

Several events can push utilisation sharply higher in a short period:
  • Whale withdrawal — a large lender exits, reducing supply instantly without changing borrow demand — ratio jumps.
  • Market volatility — traders borrow aggressively to hedge or leverage during price swings.
  • Yield farming incentives — new borrow rewards attract speculative borrowers rapidly.
  • Governance changes — adjustments to collateral factors or borrow caps redirect activity into specific pools.
  • Liquidation cascades — mass collateral liquidations create simultaneous borrow/repay flows that temporarily distort figures.

Most protocols are engineered to target this band. Below 45%, borrow demand is insufficient to generate meaningful yield for lenders. Above 80%, liquidity buffers shrink to uncomfortable levels. The 45–80% range is where protocols earn fee revenue, lenders earn competitive yields, and the pool retains 20–55% free float for normal withdrawal activity. Aave V3, for example, publishes its optimal utilisation parameter per asset — typically 80% for stablecoin majors — with steep rate jumps above that threshold to protect pool health.
BULL
YIELD SCANNER
Stop guessing. Find the highest paying pools.
GO
Entity Verification

Registered Address: Defistar.io, Clyde Offices, 2nd Floor, 48 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 1BP, Scotland, UK

Contact: Email

Industry Profile

Defistar.io is a verified member of the UK Fintech ecosystem.

Notice: This website provides informational analytics and data services only. We are not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). We do not offer, facilitate, or provide any financial services or products, including cryptocurrencies, digital assets, or derived products. Content on this site does not constitute financial advice.
DeFiStar.io is an independent data utility. We do not accept listing fees, we do not have an affiliate relationship with protocols, and we do not sell financial products. Our rankings are 100% algorithmic based on on-chain liquidity and smart contract data.
By accessing or using this website, you agree to be bound by our Terms of Service and acknowledge our Risk Disclosures.

Learn more: About Our Mission | Ranking Methodology |
© 2025–2026 defistar.io