Live utilisation rates for 53+ lending pools across Aave, Compound, Morpho, Spark, and more. Spot liquidity risk, find optimal-zone opportunities, and understand how utilisation drives your supply yield — updated every 30 minutes.
How many pools sit in each 10% band — the shape of DeFi's borrow demand curve right now.
Protocols above 80% carry elevated liquidity pressure market-wide. Morpho is excluded — its peer-to-peer model makes high utilisation structurally expected, not a risk signal.
Chain-level averages reflect local borrowing demand. High chain averages may indicate systemic liquidity pressure on that network.
Above the kink (~80%), borrow rates spike to protect pool liquidity. Market average of 57.6% marked by white dot.
| Asset | Protocol | Chain | Utilisation | Zone | Supply APY | TVL | Safety | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDUSD | Aave V3 | BNB Chain | Critical | 5.92% | $1.08M | 23 | ||
| USDC | Spark | Ethereum | Elevated | 4.14% | $17.70M | 45 | ||
| GHO | Aave V3 | Avalanche | Elevated | 3.91% | $2.14M | 24 | ||
| USDT | Compound V3 | Polygon | Elevated | 3.28% | $1.66M | 24 | ||
| USDC | Compound V3 | Polygon | Elevated | 3.22% | $2.41M | 26 | ||
| USDC | Compound V3 | Base | Optimal | 3.18% | $10.83M | 53 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Polygon | Optimal | 2.80% | $4.51M | 42 | ||
| USDC | Euler V2 | Ethereum | Optimal | 4.04% | $2.35M | 45 | ||
| USDC | Compound V3 | Optimism | Optimal | 3.08% | $3.25M | 39 | ||
| crvUSD | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 3.18% | $228.5K | 28 | ||
| USDT | Compound V3 | Optimism | Optimal | 3.01% | $3.98M | 34 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Base | Optimal | 2.47% | $399.09M | 66 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Avalanche | Optimal | 2.03% | $100.96M | 63 | ||
| USDC | Venus | BNB Chain | Optimal | 3.98% | $73.06M | 45 | ||
| DAI | Spark | Ethereum | Optimal | 2.68% | $272.30M | 58 | ||
| DAI | Aave V3 | Optimism | Optimal | 1.96% | $928.2K | 30 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.82% | $3.64B | 87 | ||
| USDS | Spark | Ethereum | Optimal | 2.55% | $95.39M | 46 | ||
| USDT | Euler V2 | Ethereum | Optimal | 2.88% | $984.0K | 31 | ||
| USDT | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.69% | $5.36B | 82 | ||
| USDT | Aave V3 | Optimism | Optimal | 1.69% | $5.91M | 50 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | BNB Chain | Optimal | 1.69% | $18.46M | 65 | ||
| USDC | Compound V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 2.59% | $413.37M | 74 | ||
| DAI | Aave V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 1.71% | $4.96M | 41 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Optimism | Optimal | 1.62% | $17.62M | 67 | ||
| USDT | Aave V3 | BNB Chain | Optimal | 1.57% | $75.67M | 60 | ||
| DAI | Aave V3 | Polygon | Optimal | 2.93% | $4.73M | 40 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 1.45% | $272.52M | 77 | ||
| USDT | Compound V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 2.39% | $202.12M | 69 | ||
| USDT | Compound V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 2.36% | $22.95M | 49 | ||
| USDT | Venus | BNB Chain | Optimal | 2.82% | $227.94M | 52 | ||
| FRAX | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.59% | $145.6K | 30 | ||
| DAI | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.32% | $182.45M | 73 | ||
| USDT | Spark | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.58% | $293.70M | 67 | ||
| EURC | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.69% | $68.96M | 62 | ||
| PYUSD | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 1.57% | $407.31M | 72 | ||
| GHO | Aave V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 1.42% | $2.67M | 37 | ||
| USDe | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Optimal | 0.86% | $1.07B | 71 | ||
| LUSD | Aave V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 1.34% | $201.8K | 27 | ||
| USDC | Compound V3 | Arbitrum | Optimal | 1.82% | $563.4K | 31 | ||
| GHO | Aave V3 | Gnosis | Low | 1.01% | $785.3K | 27 | ||
| USDtb | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Low | 0.69% | $216.62M | 70 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Scroll | Low | 0.36% | $1.31M | 40 | ||
| GHO | Aave V3 | Base | Low | 1.55% | $6.93M | 27 | ||
| EURC | Aave V3 | Avalanche | Low | 0.84% | $1.09M | 26 | ||
| FRAX | Aave V3 | Arbitrum | Low | 0.71% | $177.8K | 14 | ||
| USDbC | Aave V3 | Base | Low | 0.70% | $512.8K | 15 | ||
| EURC | Aave V3 | Base | Low | 0.85% | $15.10M | 41 | ||
| RLUSD | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Low | 0.86% | $545.14M | 59 | ||
| LUSD | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Low | 0.39% | $2.77M | 36 | ||
| PYUSD | Spark | Ethereum | Low | 0.83% | $100.00M | 45 | ||
| USDC | Aave V3 | Gnosis | Cold | 0.02% | $158.2K | 22 | ||
| USDS | Aave V3 | Ethereum | Cold | 0.10% | $44.79M | 27 |
Utilisation is the single most actionable real-time signal in a lending pool. It tells you how much capital is actively borrowed and — critically — how much remains available for withdrawal. A pool at 95% utilisation has only 5% of total deposits that can be withdrawn immediately. Everything else is locked in active loans.
The market average right now is 57.6% across 53 tracked pools. 1 pools are operating at critical capacity (≥90%) — meaning those pools carry real withdrawal risk for large positions. Always size your deposit against the free float, not the total TVL.
Every major lending protocol implements a kink-based interest rate model. From 0% up to the optimal point (typically 80%), borrow rates climb gradually. Cross the kink and rates jump sharply — often doubling or tripling within a few percentage points. This is deliberate architecture: the spike punishes excess borrowing, incentivises repayments, and pulls utilisation back toward the target band.
As a lender, you benefit from elevated yields during high-utilisation periods. But above 90%, you're also exposed to the liquidity crunch — your capital may be temporarily illiquid if it exceeds the pool's free float.
Chasing yield? Sort by Supply APY, then verify utilisation is below 90%. The optimal zone (45–80%) consistently offers the best risk-adjusted yield — high enough demand to push rates up, but enough free float to exit cleanly.
Monitoring risk? Filter by "Critical ≥90%" to immediately see which pools are near capacity. These pools pay the highest rates but carry the highest withdrawal risk — suitable only for positions smaller than the free float (TVL × (100% − utilisation %)).
Researching a protocol? Check the Protocol Average chart above. A protocol with consistently high average utilisation across all its pools signals strong borrowing demand platform-wide — generally a healthy sign, unless multiple individual pools are simultaneously in the critical zone. Note that Morpho is excluded from this dashboard — see below for why.
Morpho and Morpho Blue are deliberately not shown here. Unlike Aave, Compound, or Spark — which operate shared liquidity pools — Morpho uses a peer-to-peer matching engine that directly pairs individual lenders with individual borrowers. This architectural difference means utilisation near or at 100% is structurally expected and by design on Morpho, not a risk signal.
Displaying Morpho pools alongside conventional lending protocols would be actively misleading: a 98% utilisation figure that indicates a serious liquidity squeeze on Aave simply means "fully matched" on Morpho, with no withdrawal queue or rate spike implied. To keep this dashboard accurate and actionable, Morpho pools are excluded entirely. You can explore Morpho yields on the Yield Finder.
Supply APY ≈ Borrow Rate × Utilisation × (1 − Protocol Reserve Factor).
As utilisation climbs, both the borrow rate and the utilisation multiplier increase — so supply yield rises steeply.
The peak effective supply yield typically occurs between 85–95% utilisation, not at 100%.
At full utilisation, there are no idle deposits — but the pool would be completely illiquid, which the rate model is designed to prevent.
Registered Address: Defistar.io, Clyde Offices, 2nd Floor, 48 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 1BP, Scotland, UK
Contact: Email
Notice: This website provides informational analytics and data services only.
We are not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
We do not offer, facilitate, or provide any financial services or products, including cryptocurrencies,
digital assets, or derived products. Content on this site does not constitute financial advice.
DeFiStar.io is an independent data utility. We do not accept listing fees, we do not have an affiliate relationship with protocols, and we do not sell financial products. Our rankings are 100% algorithmic based on on-chain liquidity and smart contract data.
By accessing or using this website, you agree to be bound by our
Terms of Service
and acknowledge our Risk Disclosures.