dustcommie [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 107 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 13th, 2023

help-circle

  • dustcommie [none/use name]toSlop.Oh no
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, he does have retweets about (black) disabled people. He is well aware of how mistreated they can be(and his audience). I will be honest I do mostly disagree with BRG being irresponsible but I think I will reflect on this and think about it from some different angles. I do have work, so won't be available but might respond in a day depending on if my thought crystalize


  • dustcommie [none/use name]toSlop.Oh no
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I am not entirely sure which point(because I barely made a point lol), guessing it is the "defending disabled people owning slaves" which was more a point on reading what people are saying and putting it into a greater context. If this was not hexbear, and I was not taking into account the greater discussion, I think reading what LeninWeave wrote as defense of disabled people owning slaves would actually make a lot more sense than BRG being abelist. Jumping to BRG being ableist felt very much like ignoring the overall conversation.

    The point I probably should have made but didn't really is I think it is just rather dismissive and restrcive to essentially say that an event starting from tourretes can't grow into a larger discussion on what black people deal with, and essentially being policed on how they have to act or else they are being ableist. Yes BRG is being hyperbolic, but it fits into a larger discussion so I think it is unfair to say BRG is just drawing a straight line and equivocating these two. I will forgive BRG for not writing a nuanced dialectic, historical, materialist treaties on the interaction between race and (various) disabilities in racist ableist capitalist society and instead writing a shitposty tweet in relation to larger conversation happening in black spaces(just scrolling through what he has retweeted it seems clear that is what is happening to me).


  • dustcommie [none/use name]toSlop.Oh no
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even if it is, you are giving pretty uncharitable reading... Your post reads more like defending disabled people owning slaves than any abelism from RGB(which I don't think is your point). Given how much defense of gig industries I have seen on the basis of "helping the disabled" I wouldn't be surprised if there is some discourse that is unironic in "well they needed slaves".

    Also I have seen tons of discourse on "disability isn't an excuse for racism and general assholery they are just racists assholes" (including on hexbear)


  • dustcommie [none/use name]tonewsMutiny on the battle ship Fordtempkin
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This sounds like liberal "support the troops, hate the cheeto" wishful thinking/propaganda. Thousands of 18-20 year old, genocidal, dumb ass gross men probably flush all kinds of things all the time (bored, cum rags, ran out of toilet paper so used a shirt, had diarrhea and shit themselves, pranks and bullying etc)



  • Used to listen to SGU all the time too. Funnily, even before I knew really anything about China, I would pretty much always cringe about how they talked about China(Steve I particularly remember, I think Cara talked about the Uyghurs but that might have been her podcast) and something always seemed off about it.




  • Yah, the best case scenario is that that they are using this to get sanctions lifted, build up capacity, GET NUKES, then seize all american assets etc in 20 years time(admittedly I am more pessimistic and don't think that is the plan)... They would not be in a worst position than they are in now.

    America has adopted their own form of guerrilla tactics of drive by bombing and killing hundreds of people, kidnapping, maybe hit some hospitals or schools while they are at it then dip, likely training counter revolutionary forces in the background. Realistically there is not a lot Venezuela can do without REAL support, or the american people tearing down the empire from the inside (hell maybe even psl and other parties internationally sends people and supplies to train and fight for Venezuela if Venezuela would have them).

    I am just tired of seeing what amounts to "Many lives will be lost... but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make"(pic of communist in gamer chair posting on hexbear who will not make any sacrifices) meme unironically even if I am unhappy and disappointed with the direction they are going and presumably leading Venezuela into. We really need to internalize that the fact this is happening is a failure of communists internationally but especially in American and should take this as yet another motivation we need to step up more


  • Not being western doesn't mean you don't uphold some western leftism. Are you a guerrilla raising a popular army to bring revolution where you are at and prepared to go to Venezuela and give you blood to fight off Americans and counter revolutionary forces(probably trained by USA) in solidarity as "any true communist would"?

    I am also disappointed, but if the primary problem is American Imperialism which stops and makes communists(or any liberation struggles) sacrifice so much I have a hard time putting lots of blame on them for making compromises and biding their time and preparing(at least I hope that is their perspective, it is hard to prepare forces under debilitating sanction and no real allies helping meaningfully)... The blame is largely the failure of Americans who could actually stop this with relatively little blood shed. Of course if the Venezuelan people rise up and reject this then there would be a different conversation.




  • dustcommie [none/use name]toChapotraphousethey are not ready
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    A bunch of people here were glazing Greg Stoker, who when asked about ACAB applies to military he said no and then gave a bunch of lies like "they are held accountable" when he should know better... So I think it is safe to say not enough hexbears are "ready"




  • Interesting, I guess I am also interested in if there were previous higher rank officials where the accusations of corruption where dubious (at least while Xi Jinping had been the leader). This is an annoying position because if the whole "gave nuclear secrets" I am not sure it is in the best interest of China to confirm that. I guess there will be some vague hints as to the direction of things depending on who is appointed.