debatable

unclear

this seems less marvel brain and more deliberately intended by the writers

talk to a doctor if you can before going all out on this kind of thing. in the US it's dieticians who are a registered profession, nutritionists are snakeoil.

once you're just trying to get more calories, eating quickly will let you get more in before the stomach sends its fullness response as those of us with the opposite problem know.

meltyblood is sometimes held in gas station bathrooms

It started right after the fucking illegal creation of the state of "israel".

arguably before that even. colonial zionism is older than the nation-state

Palestinians have the right to defend themselves

Also: don't do slavery.

if you're gonna do slavery, kill the slavers and free the slaves

except bitcoin is useless and these "ai" things have nonzero useful potential

if they called them bankers somebody might bail them out

the draft, yes, but the disposability isn't only from that.

oh I read "combat" as "compulsory"

You could get rid of both Biden and Trump, whoever replaced them would be beholden to the same imperial corporate interests and be just as vile with their policies.

i think this falls off a little in that biden is especially and personally zionist. we're not going to have a pro-palestinian president over here but we could've had one who didn't illegally send weapons to israel as Biden did. We have previously had presidents who told them to ease off the genocide, including Ronald Reagan lol.

that's when it has major narrative purpose. the rest of the time you're simply not meant to be carrying all that trash loot like some hoarder. That stuff is there to make the world not be empty, not for you to have 20 sets of armor and 400 desk fans in your bag

i still don't understand how it's doing a defense of patriarchy. i'm not even bringing edge's intention into it. he asked about himself in reply to a comment that was already about the suffering of men under patriarchy so i'm not even sure it was derailing the way we usually mean talking about men making discussions about feminism about themselves.

Notice that, even here on Hexbear, the conversation is centered on whether misandry is real rather than ways to tackle the problems of systemic violence against women.

The OP is about these ideas not being equal, the way the tweet is written takes misandry for granted and rightly says they are not equivalent. We don't organize on here, the "what is to be done" kinda shit is basic stuff that everybody already knows like the men here not themselves doing violence, yelling at people we should probably stop being friends with, and running our orgs so it doesn't happen (or holding them accountable if necessary) and there's not really any conversation to have there unless someone has a specific question about running orgs or deradicalizing someone.

i see where he asked how it applied to him, but i don't understand how it's silencing or a defense of patriarchy, could you elaborate?

that's not ageism. ageism is not hiring 40 year olds at your tech startup

maybe the roof will cave in at the debate

don't threaten me with a good time

please don't jacket me.

i don't think i'm doing prescriptivism. when we're trying to communicate with other people it's kindof important to be on the same page, especially for something as socially fraught as hooking up and/or trying to date someone.

i want to signal to other agender and NB people that they don't have to binary themselves to decode whether i'm talking about them.

i don't deal with all of that but i do find myself not being able to describe my sexuality without erasing or misrepresenting myself or someone else. we don't have words for all the categories and combinations, and while i understand that labels aren't taxonomy, it would be useful to concisely communicate and validating to not misgender ourselves in the search for companionship.